Blogger
Share this content
0
2
629

employed or SA

So I have a situation where a person was employed (a female/clamant) who then resided with the proprietor of a business. As they resided at the same address in addition to business relationships, they created a partnership for tax purposes, not that the actual partnership for tax purposes was formed!

They both completed tax returns and paid the relevant liabilities due; they both also paid the class 2 NI due. This went on for about 2 years.

The claimant is now claiming employment status, regardless of the fact of copies of SA 302 for 5 Apr 11/12 have been completed, and having paid class 2 NI. No other income can be confirmed by the claimant.

Do you know of a case that would support the fact that the claimant was self-employed rather than employed? Bearing in mind that they lived together during that period.

Other than the tax implications/fines as to not registering a partnership. I would assume that the claimant was self-employed.

Strange one I know, but guidance would be appreciated.

Replies

Please login or register to join the discussion.

I'm confused

Did they have babies or not?

Thanks (0)
avatar
By puzzel
29th Jan 2013 11:40

You are really sad

No they did not, your graciousness, mearly a working relationship though some exchange of fluids may have taken place!

Thanks (0)