Share this content

Possible VAT reclaim for playgroup

Possible VAT reclaim for playgroup

A client runs a successful pre-school playgroup, which is a registered charity.

They are now looking to extend, and have asked if there is any way they can reclaim the Vat on the costs of building the extension.

I suspect that as their supply is exempt they cannot register for Vat, but does anybody know different, or can point me to the relevant legislation.

Tony Collins


Please login or register to join the discussion.

By Anonymous
11th Feb 2008 11:49

Zero rating applies to buildings which are used for a relevant charitable purpose: Sch 8 Group 5.

"Relevant charitable purpose" does not include business. I picked up Tottel's VAT by A St John Price to have a refresher on this, and he has a section called "Confusing cases on non-business nurseries"...the nub of which is whether the charitable activity disqualifies itself as being a business. Given that his conclusion is that he has difficulty in reconciling some of the judgments, I would suggest that us lesser mortals might tread with care!
Cases to read up on:
Yarburgh Children's Trust and St Paul's Community Project
John thinks that HMRC's Business Brief 4/03 is of little practical help. But I would read through all HMRC's leaflets and see how you go. You may have a really easy case, or it may be more complex, depends on the activities!

Thanks (0)
By Anonymous
11th Feb 2008 15:46

Zero rating wouldn't apply to an extension
so we're left with standard rated supplies and a means to recover that input tax.

As previous poster has commented, unless the facts fits that of Yarborough - which basically meant they were providing a service at below cost, subsidised by freely given grants - then the charity will be in business and therefore unable to reclaim VAT due to playgroup activities being exempt.

Even if they could argue they were 100% non-business, they'd still struggle to get an extension zero rated on the basis it is not a new building. An updated Business Brief (2/2005) :-

may be more helpful than the previous brief as HMRC had time to lick their wounds.

Thanks (0)