Staff support

Staff support

Didn't find your answer?

I believe that when a client has got an issue with a member of staff, and where that staff is not in the wrong, I need to support my staff and defend him/her. To me its all about being fair. My fellow partner on the other hand claims that the client is always right and would never try to defend his staff as this may cause him to lose a client. Is that correct? I would like to know how others think about this. Thank you

Replies (8)

Please login or register to join the discussion.

avatar
By andy.partridge
10th Jan 2012 10:26

Do you want to keep the client?

If so, publicly support the client, while privately supporting the member of staff.

You do not describe the 'issue' so it is difficult to do more than generalise.

Thanks (0)
avatar
By aaron01
10th Jan 2012 11:09

Thank you Andy. The incident in particular was: Staff being held in traffic while going to a VAT inspection at the client's premises. Even though he left very much on time, he was still about 10 mins late which got the client pretty upset.

I like to please the clients as much as I can, but surely you need to show that you care for your staff as well. They would probably appreciate a more public support from time to time. 

The above is just one example of what happened. There are a few more where the other partner just seems to support the client no matter what.

Maybe I am simply too honest ;) I will end up with no clients and just my staff!! 

 

 

 

 

Thanks (0)
By ShirleyM
10th Jan 2012 11:14

I've had this issue with one client

Look at the bigger picture. Do any other clients have a problem with that member of staff? If not, then put it down to a personality clash, or the client being unreasonable (not able to manipulate said member of staff????).

If you think it is the client, then have an informat chat with them and ask what the problem is. If it is something that can be easily solved, then solve it. If it isn't possible to accommodate their requirements then be straight with them and explain why.

In my particular experience the client resented the fact that they did not have immediate access to me, and my new employee was taking on some of my previous responsibilities. The client wasn't happy to deal with anyone but me, and I wasn't willing to be a personal slave to this client, so we eventually parted ways.

I agree that staff moral is far more important than one client. They need to see you are supporting them and not agreeing with the client behind their back.

EDIT: just seen your new post. It looks as though this client needs a bit of pampering and being made to feel important. Pamper them, or tell them they are not paying enough for preferential treatment and get rid.

Thanks (0)
Replying to johngroganjga:
avatar
By aaron01
10th Jan 2012 11:27

Thanks Shirley...I agree with you...But i simply dont like client's who need too much pampering and whose egos need to be fed day in, day out...I rather we part ways than me resenting to hear from them.

Thanks (2)
avatar
By Richard Willis
11th Jan 2012 08:59

Why not suggest that your partner

services the client PERSONALLY; then you will see where his 'loyalties' lie!

BTW, my view is that the client is being totally unreasonable (unless this has happened more than once of course!).

Thanks (0)
avatar
By andy.partridge
11th Jan 2012 09:49

Did this happen?

Let's say the client is nervous because they have a VAT inspection. They are told not to worry because the accountants will supervise the visit (for a fee). The client is briefed not to talk accounts to the VAT official and not to engage in any small talk because they might be fishing.

VAT official turns up on time, but accountant does not. VAT official asks how business is doing in difficult economic times. Client does not reply. VAT official thinks the client's manner a bit odd. Client gets flustered. Accountant still hasn't arrived. Client gets annoyed because he's being made to look a prat.

Did this happen? If it did, I'm with the client!

Thanks (0)
Replying to lionofludesch:
avatar
By aaron01
11th Jan 2012 11:01

Nope, its not the way it all happened. That was a follow up to an initial VAT inspection which the staff had attended and considerable effort has been put to that effect as the VAT inspector was looking into details for the past 4 yrs. 

On top of  that the staff did call the client to advise that he may be about 10 mins late.. so I believe they are being a tad too demanding...

 

But if it happened like you said, then I agree with you, I would be agree with the client.

Thanks (0)
avatar
By DazedByTheLight
11th Jan 2012 12:19

I don't think it need be as black and white as supporting one or the other.

 

You should apologise to the client for the tardiness of your employee and express your sincere concern that it did not inconvenience the client too much. There is no need to discuss in any detail or attempt to justify the actions of the specific member of staff.

 

Separately you should speak to the member of staff, explain what the client has said, and inform them that in your opinion it is not an issue but to tread carefully in future with this client.

 

And then you can decide whether you want to continue having this type of conversation with this client into the future!

Thanks (0)