Dangerous Qualifieds

Dangerous Qualifieds

Didn't find your answer?

Have just followed up an article in one of the Sundays.

www.waynefontana.com/4466.htm.

Understandably Glyn Geoffrey Ellis. a.k.a. Wayne Fontana is very upset. Some of the issues appear to have arisen because of failure of the appointed receiver to pass on correspondence.

Is David Alexander Hole, a licensed Insolvency practioner a qualified accountant and member of one of the UK accountancy bodies?

If so what protection has the receivers regulatory body afforded the complainant?

John Smith

Replies (6)

Please login or register to join the discussion.

avatar
By martinfoley07
29th Apr 2007 19:22

Pretty bizarre posting.....
......but I guess it is Sunday afternoon.

(i) ..."have just followed up..".
Are we allowed to know what your follow up actually was? You give no inkling. Or are you saying your (past tense) "follow up" comprises posting a query on aweb !!!

(ii) your link does not work

(iii) if D A Hole is a licensed Insovency Practitioner, it is presumably that professional / regulatory body that the complainant (assuming there is one) goes to first?

(iv) since the complainant (assuming there is one) has got so far as to get his story into a Sunday paper, he is surely capable of ascertaining what additional professional body (if any) his receiver belongs to and, if no satisfaction is obtained from the primary regulatory body, take up the matter with D A Hole's additional professional bodies?

(v) are you Wayne Fontana and seeking our help? If so, please just be clearer and I am sure we can help.

(vi) if you are "John Smith", please just be clearer as to what the heck the posting is all about !!!

Thanks (0)
avatar
By IanRiley
30th Apr 2007 13:03

That's not just bizarre..
.. it's mindbending!

Thanks (0)
avatar
By AnonymousUser
01st May 2007 09:38

The insolvency specialist
see:

http://www.alexanderbc.com/founder.html

Thanks (0)
avatar
By User deleted
30th Apr 2007 21:39

So he doesn't like bills?
This article I take it?

http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=451378&in_page_id=1770

So he doesn't like being asked for money, and he doesn't like being made bankrupt when he doesn't pay it?

He's not the only one I'm sure.

"5. Camden County Council have taken pictures anyone could take of signs near Drury Lane and claimed they were the signs I parked near when they put two tickets on my car and had two sets of bailiffs take payments for. The first set, with the help of Glossop police took £1200 plus. The second set had one of their cars set on fire and ran off. But later returned and illegally took a payment of £573 plus from my wife, while I was safely locked up again in Buxton SSSC.

6. The culmination of all this harassment and accompanying stress, is that I now have to appear in front of a Judge and Jury at Derby Crown Court on the 25th May 2007 and justify an alleged setting fire to a thugs (bailiffs) car."

This is a fantastic wording, I like it. The stress lead to him being charged? So if he had been relaxed about it the bailiff wouldn't have been that bothered and probably wouldn't have mentioned it?

The word idiot keeps lodging itself in my mind. Only the Wail on Sunday would have printed such tosh.

Thanks (0)
avatar
By Chris Smail
01st May 2007 12:08

Terrible
I think it is dreadful the way common tax evaders are persecuted by the courts. What is this country comming to.

Thanks (0)
avatar
By The_Saint
01st May 2007 20:38

Complaint
The complainant can with ease seek out the regulatory body of which the "Receiver" is a member and make a complaint.

I have looked at the Wayne Fontana website and it appears that he was adjudged bankrupt presumably on a HM Revenue & Customs petition. If so, he would have had the opportunity to oppose the bankruptcy petition at Court. A Bankruptcy Court Registrar must have made the bankruptcy order based on available evidence. If Mr Fontana believes the petition was erroneous he should make application to annul the bankruptcy order.

The licensing bodies for IPs are active in ensuring that complaints are dealt with and if there has been a severe lapse on the IP's part warranting disciplinary proceedings then action is taken. If the complaint is upheld the IP could face a fine, censure and in severe cases of deriliction of duties loss of his/her insolvency licence.

A prime role of the IP as Trustee in Bankrupcy is to realise the assets of the bankrupt's estate at the time of the making of the order for the benefit of the estate creditors. The trustee is not working for the bankrupt but the estate creditors!

The practitioner in question appears to be a member of the Insolvency Practitioners Association. If the complaint is genuine then complain to the correct body. He can also involve his Member of Parliament in questioning the IP.

A perfect way for the complainant to generate funds to repay his creditors in full would be for one of his compositions to be used to promote a retail product....perhaps mushrooms. I am sure he can get his head around that one!

Thanks (0)