How do I prepare my business accounts?

I'm a new smalll limited company using the flat rate VAT scheme.  How do I prepare my accounts?  Until now, I have been preparing my profit and loss report by looking at my sales(net) - my purchases (net).  Do I need to change this? 

HMRC web says..

It is expected that accounts for businesses who are using the scheme will be prepared using gross receipts, less the flat rate VAT percentage, for turnover and that expenses will include the irrecoverable input VAT.

What does this mean?

Thanks for your help

Comments

Could be my first yellow card from the moderators here!!

stephenkendrew | | Permalink

If you don't understand what HMRC mean then I must question whether you are sufficiently competent to prepare small company accounts and am concerned at what other errors you might make.

I will try and answer your question with an example: -

assume sales £2,000 plus VAT of £300, expenses £1,000 plus VAT of £150 and flat rate scheme of 10%: -

the P & L would be: -

Sales  £2,070  (2,000 + 300 - 230(10% of 2300))

Expenses  £1,150   (incl VAT)

Net profit  £ 920

 

 

 

 

I'll start....

Anonymous | | Permalink

First expenses- your expenses in the profit and loss account must now include VAT, as you cannot recover it. So a bill of 100 pounds plus VAT for stationery will be recorded at 117.50.

Sales - you are charging VAT at 17.5%, yet you are paying over only, say 13%. You effectively keep the difference, therefore your sales are higher by this difference. So, if you make a sale of 1000 pounds, you charge 1175 to the customer. You will only pay 130 to HMRC. You will record sales of 1000 plus 45 (the 45 is 175 less 130, the amount you actually pay to HMRC) = 1045.

Does that help?

S

 

Sorry

Anonymous | | Permalink

amendment to my answer, of course, as Stephen has pointed out, you apply the flat rate %age for sales to the 'grossed up sales'. In my example, 13% of 1175 = 152.75, so your sales figure is 1000 + 175 -152.75 = 1022.25.

S

Very clear...

Anonymous | | Permalink

Thanks for the clarity...I'm completely clear now. 

Final question: 

I have prepared my first set of accounts showing Turnover (net) less expenses (net).  I have submitted these to Companies House and prepared my Corporation tax return on this basis.  What is your advice?

Do I just prepare them correctly from now on? or, should I attempt to somehow resubmit? 

 

Submit amended accounts

Anonymous | | Permalink

As you need to get the figures right for HMRC, I would suggest that you complete them correctly, then submit them to Companies House with the word 'amending' on the first page. As long as you were in time for the original submission, you will not be penalised by Companies House.

V. helpful

Anonymous | | Permalink

Big thanks for all the responses

stupid

kenny achampong | | Permalink

Using Stephen's example, I agree that is how HMRC have said it should be accounted for, but I can't help feeling it's just stupid. How can you have a set of accounts that does not have a proper sales/turnover figure in it ? Surely that is the most relevant/important figure in a set of accounts.

So I would show the VAT FRS profit separate, so I show:-

fees receivable     = £2,000

profit on VAT FRS = £70

Expenses             = £1,150

Profit                    = £920

Similarly, if the expenses are £1,000, do they really suddenly increase to £1,150 by going onto the scheme. Obviously not. So I would argue that they should also be net, and then the accounts should look like:

Fees receivable     = £2,000

Loss on FRS        =   -£80 (the profit above less the £150 they lose out on)

Expenses             = £1,000

Profit                   = £920

So in this example, you can see the accounts consistently with the accounts prior to going on the scheme, and also show exactly how much has been saved (or in his example lost) by going onto the scheme. Surely that makes a lot more sense and is far more transparent and the profit is the same in all 3 accounts so why would HMRC give a hoot ? I suppose they know best though.

 

 

 

  

 

 

Abbreviated accounts

kenny achampong | | Permalink

Also, if the accounts are shown with net figures, how did the accounts balance ? you must have had some VAT FRS balancing figure shown somewhere in the P+L, in which case the abbreviated accounts don't change.  

petersaxton's picture

What's stupid?

petersaxton | | Permalink

Kenny

HMRC advice makes sense.

You sell something for £1,175 and have a deduction based on this sales figure so why not show the sales after the deduction? You could always keep the sales as £1,175 and have a separate amount in expenses for the payment to HMRC.

If you make a payment of £117.50 for stationery why not show that figure as expenses?

It's more stupid to still have the hassle of identifying the VAT and working out a profit/loss on the FRS.

Chris Smail's picture

We split out the FR VAT

Chris Smail | | Permalink

Gross Sales

Less Flat Rate VAT due:

Sales

Cost of Sales

.

.

.

 

Fees receivable

kenny achampong | | Permalink

So Peter, do you not agree that your income (net of VAT obviously) is in any way meaningful in a set of accounts ?

petersaxton's picture

Yes, that's the reason for HMRCs suggestion

petersaxton | | Permalink

 The HMRC suggestion is net of VAT.

If you make a sale of £117.50 (inc VAT) and pay VAT of £15.00 then HMRC say you show sales of £102.50. That's the amount you receive as well. What's wrong with that?

FRS

kenny achampong | | Permalink

because it's wrong ?

petersaxton's picture

Try thinking and then explaining

petersaxton | | Permalink

You'll have to be more analytical to convince me.

How about this?

Stationery expense of £100 + VAT

Non-VAT registered trader - expense in P & L a/c: £117.50

VAT registered trader using the FRS which is only based on sales and expenses are not relevant - expense in P & L a/c: £117.50

VAT registered trader not using FRS - expense in P & L a/c: £100.00

Do you disagree with any of the above and if so WHY?

 

 

 

 

cverrier's picture

or...get some software to handle this stuff for you....

cverrier | | Permalink

You're a new small business - fantastic! - good luck!

But it's all the more important to be able to focus on doing what you're good at (and what people pay you for) than on the inevitable admin.

You've clearly had some advice on joining the VAT FRS - did you speak to an accountant?  Can they also not help you on the bookeeping?

The right bit of software can also largely eliminate all of these headaches.

Have a look at FreeAgent - (It's what I use - I have no other stake in it than that).   It'll let you enter up clients, invoices, expenses and bills, and it'll take care of the reporting (including FRS) for you.   It'll tell you when your VAT return is due (and what the figures are). It'll generate a P&L and a Balance Sheet  for your accounts.  It'll even take care of your payroll and dividends.

www.freeagentcentral.com

 

 

expenses

kenny achampong | | Permalink

I completely take your point re expenses and agree (I was just suggesting a way that in my opinion woul be better, because you can quantify the savings by being on the scheme and so know if the scheme is preferable or not).

Its the fees receivable figure that I have an issue with HMRC about. I keep tabs on the fees I invoice and that is the figure is in my accounts. It's the figure that interests me the most and let's me know how well I'm doing compared to last year. I don't really want, and definitely do not care, what my fees receivable + a random flat rate VAT fraction is.

petersaxton's picture

You should care

petersaxton | | Permalink

You should care what your fees receivable and “a random flat rate VAT fraction” is. This is because your fees receivable (inc VAT) is what you will receive and “a random flat rate VAT fraction” is what you’ll pay to HMRC.