Legal privilege and the tax adviser
In Taxation, Vol 163 No 4196 (05 March 2009), in the third and final of his (excellent) series of articles on HMRC's new powers to inspect premises, Keith Gordon confirms that
"... a letter from a (non-lawyer) CTA containing tax advice would not be exempt from disclosure to an HMRC officer".
In my dim and distant past I had to attend training on money-laundering regulations and was advised that if a taxpayer comes to us for advice about arrangements that might be reportable to SOCA, we as accountants were authorised to provide that advice (without reference to SOCA), under the supposed umbrella of legal privilege.
Either I have misinterpreted the course instructions or there is one definition of legal privilege for MLR purposes and another for the purposes of Sch 36 FA 2008.
I should be grateful if someone in the peanut gallery set me straight.
- 'Workers' for AE purposes 53 1
- Payroll question 205 3
- Share buyback, possible embezzlement 250 5
- Do accountants work at home? 260 6
- Where did you buy your Fujitsu ScanSnap ix500? 51 3
- Best Tax / Accounts Production software 748 13
- Can a trust benefit from PPR 704 6
- VAT Registration 199 1
- How do you do it 391 1
- Help 479 14
- Payments on account 312 6
- Where has Portia gone? 5,837 119
- What are other accountants having for lunch? 775 21
- ER Relief 45 1
- Do you need to account for a director loan separate from the current account 98 1
- Kashflow balance sheet difference 321 1
- Sage 50 accounts 101 3
- Abbreviated accounts Companies House 115 1
- Keeping disastrous accounts 561 6
- What do people do with signed accounts/engagement letters/tax returns? 504 12