VAT scheme on 'excess' MOT charges
Hi all! Thanks for taking the time to read this.
As the title suggests need some information on the treatment of MOT and VAT. I have done some research and would like some input on the conclusion reached if willing?
Client is a VAT registered business in the automobile repair industry. Client does not conduct MOT tests however subcontract this and charges the customer the cost plus a mark up.
Should the MOT charge be: (i) outside the scope of VAT; (ii) standard VAT on mark up ('excess' hereafter) or (iii) standard VAT on cost plus mark up.
Research and conclusion
I have reviewed VTAXPER48000 and VTAXPER39000.
The MOT charge would be (i) outside the scope of VAT as "provided the unapproved garage charges on the exact amount it has been charged by the test centre and shows this separately on the invoice to its customer, it may treat this element as a disbursement and also outside the scope of VAT".
The MOT charge would be (ii) standard VAT on mark up as "any amount charged by an unapproved garage to its customer over and above the amount charged by the test centre is consideration for its own service of arranging the test as agent of the customer and is taxable at the standard rate".
The MOT charge would be (iii) standard VAT on cost plus mark up as "if the unapproved garage chooses not to treat the exact amount charged by the test centre as a disbursement, or otherwise does not satisfy all the conditions set out in VTAXPER39000, it must account for VAT on the full invoiced amount".
The 8 conditions stated in VTAXPER39000 being:
- the person acted as an agent of his client when he paid the third party;
- the client and not the agent used the goods and services supplied by the third party (in practice, this is usually the key condition);
- the client was responsible for paying the third party;
- the agent was authorised by his client to pay the third party on his behalf;
- the client knew that the goods or services were to be provided to him by a third party;
- the agent’s outlay is separately itemised when he invoices the client;
- the amount recovered from the client is exactly the same amount as paid to the third party;
- the goods or services paid for by the agent are clearly additional to the agent’s own supplies.
How rigorously should these be tested - would it be a fair assumption that most automobile repair business subcontracting MOT would meed these conditions by default?
- Uncomfortable with some advertising Sift takes 561 18
- Capital allowances on a 3G Pitch 71 4
- Audit 180 3
- What is the status of "Whistleblowing" these days - do you get rewarded? 721 22
- Do I need to pay my accountant 929 11
- Joining the flat rate scheme retrospectively 1,101 12
- LLP members transfer to limited companies. 114 1
- carry back of gift aid 182 3
- Employee to move to Isle of Man 300 8
- Awkward IP 1,251 12
- What's in a name ? 1,011 8
- Straightforward email correspondence or PDF letter attached to blank email? 888 10
- Negligible value - JJB Sports 224 1
- Buying Microsoft's Surface Pro 3 560 11
- Is it possible to change a client's trading address for Vat purposes online 239 3
- Should everyone be entitled to a personal allowance 405 6
- Potentially dodgy client 448 3
- CIC Tax - what is trading? 568 28
- Entrepeneurs relief 473 18
- French Excise Duty - Help Please! 408 9
- CTA study material 786
- Anyone have clients that use Pay4Later to offer customers credit? 485
- Raiders of the Lost Tax File 431
- Employment related securities question 313
- AIM Stocks and IHT 293
- Expat pension contributions? 270
- Tax Relief for overseas employees 265
- Trust for Employee 249
- Service Charge Accountant Career Options 202
- IPP (International Pension Plan) income 154