VAT scheme on 'excess' MOT charges
Hi all! Thanks for taking the time to read this.
As the title suggests need some information on the treatment of MOT and VAT. I have done some research and would like some input on the conclusion reached if willing?
Client is a VAT registered business in the automobile repair industry. Client does not conduct MOT tests however subcontract this and charges the customer the cost plus a mark up.
Should the MOT charge be: (i) outside the scope of VAT; (ii) standard VAT on mark up ('excess' hereafter) or (iii) standard VAT on cost plus mark up.
Research and conclusion
I have reviewed VTAXPER48000 and VTAXPER39000.
The MOT charge would be (i) outside the scope of VAT as "provided the unapproved garage charges on the exact amount it has been charged by the test centre and shows this separately on the invoice to its customer, it may treat this element as a disbursement and also outside the scope of VAT".
The MOT charge would be (ii) standard VAT on mark up as "any amount charged by an unapproved garage to its customer over and above the amount charged by the test centre is consideration for its own service of arranging the test as agent of the customer and is taxable at the standard rate".
The MOT charge would be (iii) standard VAT on cost plus mark up as "if the unapproved garage chooses not to treat the exact amount charged by the test centre as a disbursement, or otherwise does not satisfy all the conditions set out in VTAXPER39000, it must account for VAT on the full invoiced amount".
The 8 conditions stated in VTAXPER39000 being:
- the person acted as an agent of his client when he paid the third party;
- the client and not the agent used the goods and services supplied by the third party (in practice, this is usually the key condition);
- the client was responsible for paying the third party;
- the agent was authorised by his client to pay the third party on his behalf;
- the client knew that the goods or services were to be provided to him by a third party;
- the agent’s outlay is separately itemised when he invoices the client;
- the amount recovered from the client is exactly the same amount as paid to the third party;
- the goods or services paid for by the agent are clearly additional to the agent’s own supplies.
How rigorously should these be tested - would it be a fair assumption that most automobile repair business subcontracting MOT would meed these conditions by default?
- Accountants' Error 708 14
- Corporation tax due date confusion 32 1
- Paint Manufacturer Flat Rate Scheme 157 5
- ICPA taxwise fee protection 150 3
- Scoot 190 4
- Zero Rated VAT on New Building 156 2
- Tax code for Companies House fees 213 3
- G'day IPA-IFA 663 11
- Why do HMRC have a different FPS liability to the amount I sent? 1,454 20
- VAT customer is registered in France, goods shipped to the UK 111 1
- Regaining my qualification 211 2
- Self-Assessment - NIC Exemption 238 2
- Recommendations for tax advice sole practitioner 240 2
- Auto enrolment 197 3
- Shareholder agreement 175 3
- Tax treatment of cashed in American Savings Plan 197 3
- Company Reorganisation 168 3
- Employee Loan 214 2
- IRIS - Personal Tax - 2013/14 - Page UKP2 468 15
- Statutory residence test - transit days 598 5
- Skandia using wrong address 1,453
- Nil Rate Band Trust - index linked debt by way of charge over property 770
- Any views 700
- HMRC Employers Diary 524
- International interest certificate 426
- Stamp Duty on share for share exchange 392
- Sale of business 357
- NOVA 261
- Advertising services? 258
- IRIS Open Books problem 251