Another section 29 question
A neighbour (really) made a royal mess of his 2009/10 tax return, overstating schedule E income and more importantly overstating tax deducted at source. The errors appear to stem mainly from him misreading his P60, which had been printed out of alignment with the stationery. On receiving his return, HMRC issued a refund for the difference between the tax deducted at source on his return less the tax actually deducted at source. Neighbour received the refund without appreciating what it was for. In fact his standard tax code exactly covered his liability for the year (but not tax due from the previous year - see below).
I have to confess that personal tax isn't my cup of tea, but I did say I would look at it for him. Having gone through the numbers I agree that he did get a repayment when he shouldn't have and also that, because they accepted the figures on his return, HMRC failed to demand another £1,000 that they claim had been coded out from 2008/09 into 2009/10 (although neighbour and his employer have no knowledge of a notice of coding for this). Neighbour is now unemployed and doesn't have the funds to make the repayment and pay the tax from 2008/09. My instinct is that he should pay it, but I feel I ought to also check that he is required to pay it.
Looking at schedule 29, HMRC need to rely, I believe, on either s.29(4) [fraudulent or negligent conduct] or s.29(5) [officer couldn't be expected to be aware of the need for assessment]. As the assessment relates solely to schedule E income and in particular to tax deducted at source for which HMRC had full details, presumably HMRC cannot now argue a case for s.29(5), which leaves fraud or negligence. Have I got this right, and do people here feel HMRC have grounds for claiming negligence?
Next question: HMRC have written that they intend to charge a penalty for failure to take reasonable care. Are there grounds for challenging this?
Final question: Ignoring section 29 for now, presumably HMRC are able to reclaim the over-repayment [repayment made in 2010/11; this correspondence started in 2011/12]. Is this correct?
- error on companies house accounts 602 17
- Invoice in directors name - can company claim VAT?? 155 1
- New client procedure 30 1
- Transfer of stock 129 6
- Reversal of Warranty Provision 194 7
- Do you get your clients to sign their EOY EPS submission? 724 9
- Are these allowable capital expenditures for a jewellery retail shop? 372 12
- FBI2 115 2
- Any Answers changes - feedback required 3,597 116
- Statutory Residence Test - is HMRC Guidance wrong? 1,110 9
- Tolley UK sales number 47 1
- On line Remote Training 101 2
- Is a property owner charging a peppercorn rent to a limited company acceptable 379 9
- PPR election time limit - change in the number of residences 74 1
- Virtually Impossible 377 6
- Personal allowance for non-resident 99 2
- Anti- Money Laundering - CIMA Practising Certification Application 152 2
- Brightpay 103 1
- SAGE 50 - Invoice Date 67 1
- Newly Started Practice 605 12
- QROP pension input amounts 486
- HMRC BENCHMARK EXPENSES 461
- write off loan or loan to equity swap or both 428
- EPS and CIS deductions 283
- Sole trade business in UK, but the owner works from EU 274
- Construction CIS LLP Company 264
- Stamp duty on house transfer between spouses 226
- SAGE winforecast 189
- Managing deliberate defaulters hmrc 183
- LIVE: Budget aftermath webinar 175