Another section 29 question
A neighbour (really) made a royal mess of his 2009/10 tax return, overstating schedule E income and more importantly overstating tax deducted at source. The errors appear to stem mainly from him misreading his P60, which had been printed out of alignment with the stationery. On receiving his return, HMRC issued a refund for the difference between the tax deducted at source on his return less the tax actually deducted at source. Neighbour received the refund without appreciating what it was for. In fact his standard tax code exactly covered his liability for the year (but not tax due from the previous year - see below).
I have to confess that personal tax isn't my cup of tea, but I did say I would look at it for him. Having gone through the numbers I agree that he did get a repayment when he shouldn't have and also that, because they accepted the figures on his return, HMRC failed to demand another £1,000 that they claim had been coded out from 2008/09 into 2009/10 (although neighbour and his employer have no knowledge of a notice of coding for this). Neighbour is now unemployed and doesn't have the funds to make the repayment and pay the tax from 2008/09. My instinct is that he should pay it, but I feel I ought to also check that he is required to pay it.
Looking at schedule 29, HMRC need to rely, I believe, on either s.29(4) [fraudulent or negligent conduct] or s.29(5) [officer couldn't be expected to be aware of the need for assessment]. As the assessment relates solely to schedule E income and in particular to tax deducted at source for which HMRC had full details, presumably HMRC cannot now argue a case for s.29(5), which leaves fraud or negligence. Have I got this right, and do people here feel HMRC have grounds for claiming negligence?
Next question: HMRC have written that they intend to charge a penalty for failure to take reasonable care. Are there grounds for challenging this?
Final question: Ignoring section 29 for now, presumably HMRC are able to reclaim the over-repayment [repayment made in 2010/11; this correspondence started in 2011/12]. Is this correct?
- Stamp duty on multiple property transaction 287 17
- Free invoicing software 62 1
- New business - journal entries 187 15
- BTL property solely in wife's name - can she split rental income with husband? 522 15
- CIS deductions against the wrong UTR 227 7
- Why should I retain membership? 2,532 43
- Looking for BIK v mileage comparison software 149 2
- Capitalised professional fees - with no corresponding asset 393 4
- 100% Annual investment allowance on luxury cars 655 17
- Alerting clients versus walking away from clients 324 4
- Trade name 47 1
- Resident Landlord Expenses 170 6
- Samadian effect on self employed student support workers 106 3
- Employee shareholder contracts 101 1
- Lettings expenses 102 2
- Capital Allowances and Building Improvements 356 12
- Annual tax investigation cover fee? 326 11
- Can a sole-trader make pension contributions to avoid loss of personal allowance? 296 9
- PAYE 459 12
- Using CT600.pdf if all the directors are different 94 1
- Auto enrolment excuses 729
- Feedback on accounts production software for IFRS 699
- Add T&Cs to Sales Order in Sage 374
- Social investment tax relief 194
- Digita Hosted Software 187
- Call Centre Data Costs 183
- option to tax 167
- VAT on deposits 160
- Buying goods in US and selling them to company in US 147
- Travel costs and contractors 137