Another section 29 question
A neighbour (really) made a royal mess of his 2009/10 tax return, overstating schedule E income and more importantly overstating tax deducted at source. The errors appear to stem mainly from him misreading his P60, which had been printed out of alignment with the stationery. On receiving his return, HMRC issued a refund for the difference between the tax deducted at source on his return less the tax actually deducted at source. Neighbour received the refund without appreciating what it was for. In fact his standard tax code exactly covered his liability for the year (but not tax due from the previous year - see below).
I have to confess that personal tax isn't my cup of tea, but I did say I would look at it for him. Having gone through the numbers I agree that he did get a repayment when he shouldn't have and also that, because they accepted the figures on his return, HMRC failed to demand another £1,000 that they claim had been coded out from 2008/09 into 2009/10 (although neighbour and his employer have no knowledge of a notice of coding for this). Neighbour is now unemployed and doesn't have the funds to make the repayment and pay the tax from 2008/09. My instinct is that he should pay it, but I feel I ought to also check that he is required to pay it.
Looking at schedule 29, HMRC need to rely, I believe, on either s.29(4) [fraudulent or negligent conduct] or s.29(5) [officer couldn't be expected to be aware of the need for assessment]. As the assessment relates solely to schedule E income and in particular to tax deducted at source for which HMRC had full details, presumably HMRC cannot now argue a case for s.29(5), which leaves fraud or negligence. Have I got this right, and do people here feel HMRC have grounds for claiming negligence?
Next question: HMRC have written that they intend to charge a penalty for failure to take reasonable care. Are there grounds for challenging this?
Final question: Ignoring section 29 for now, presumably HMRC are able to reclaim the over-repayment [repayment made in 2010/11; this correspondence started in 2011/12]. Is this correct?
- Can you get tax deduction for legal fees on sale of debtors 159 7
- Disposal of property 19 1
- Playstation 4 - Allowable expense or not? 2,267 28
- Tax Return Deadlines 274 5
- do I have to pay NI? 36 1
- Personal returns late information - when to get tough? 1,228 15
- Website - Any guess on their business ... 74 1
- what time is it ? 433 5
- Sage 50 Accounts - Opening Bank Account Balance Posted to Nominal 9998 Suspense Account 447 25
- VAT chargeable or not? 117 3
- Concerned about RTI 2014 2,271 55
- find-accountants.com 259 3
- Matching of tax return to P60 184 4
- Capital Allowances on Foreign Property 109 3
- trading or dormant 163 3
- Funds introduced by company secretary... 284 5
- Consolidation and subsidiaries with different period ends 211 8
- Related Parties Note 203 4
- Business Christmas Greetings 1,074 20
- Whats the best way to keep my accounts? 805 22
- Desperately seeking Susan, Sam or anyone with any other name 938
- Experience with Islamic investor following Sharia-compliant rules? 533
- Darwinpay Partnership Assessment 343
- How to format a stock book 330
- Tax efficient holding company structure 266
- S464A Charge to tax: conferring benefit & BIK 253
- Investment property company accounts template 236
- RTI and Annual Directors Salary 201
- auto enrolment - calculation of first pension deduction 200
- Charge out rates in London? 166