Another section 29 question
A neighbour (really) made a royal mess of his 2009/10 tax return, overstating schedule E income and more importantly overstating tax deducted at source. The errors appear to stem mainly from him misreading his P60, which had been printed out of alignment with the stationery. On receiving his return, HMRC issued a refund for the difference between the tax deducted at source on his return less the tax actually deducted at source. Neighbour received the refund without appreciating what it was for. In fact his standard tax code exactly covered his liability for the year (but not tax due from the previous year - see below).
I have to confess that personal tax isn't my cup of tea, but I did say I would look at it for him. Having gone through the numbers I agree that he did get a repayment when he shouldn't have and also that, because they accepted the figures on his return, HMRC failed to demand another £1,000 that they claim had been coded out from 2008/09 into 2009/10 (although neighbour and his employer have no knowledge of a notice of coding for this). Neighbour is now unemployed and doesn't have the funds to make the repayment and pay the tax from 2008/09. My instinct is that he should pay it, but I feel I ought to also check that he is required to pay it.
Looking at schedule 29, HMRC need to rely, I believe, on either s.29(4) [fraudulent or negligent conduct] or s.29(5) [officer couldn't be expected to be aware of the need for assessment]. As the assessment relates solely to schedule E income and in particular to tax deducted at source for which HMRC had full details, presumably HMRC cannot now argue a case for s.29(5), which leaves fraud or negligence. Have I got this right, and do people here feel HMRC have grounds for claiming negligence?
Next question: HMRC have written that they intend to charge a penalty for failure to take reasonable care. Are there grounds for challenging this?
Final question: Ignoring section 29 for now, presumably HMRC are able to reclaim the over-repayment [repayment made in 2010/11; this correspondence started in 2011/12]. Is this correct?
- Unhappy client over fees 1,001 24
- ACCA student with study package 277 7
- Letter saying client is IR35 compliant 1,313 13
- COMPANIES HOUSE - DOWN LOAD FREE ACCOUNTS 222 8
- HMRC Online services Issue 235 10
- VAT exempt question.. 138 4
- do i need an online accounting software 450 5
- Financing goodwill 158 3
- Auto enrolment pension scheme set up 603 13
- Eligibility to FRS VAT 168 2
- ltd company 183 3
- Flat rate VAT and Work in progress 249 4
- How did the VAT Office get the bank account? 244 2
- Does pension term assurance count for unused relief purposes? 364 2
- What VAT rate 153 3
- Preference Shares and Dividend Waivers 152 1
- Self-employed: claiming expenses initially paid by somebody else 257 8
- Foreign Dividends: UK tax credit 269 5
- Staff commissions 151 1
- Company Van - Classic vehicle 286 4
- NHS finance professionals 782
- Foreign Pension Contribution 464
- Pre Season Invoice dated September how do you treat the VAT as not due until May 16 453
- SWAT AML v Anti Money Laundering Compliance Plus (AMLCP) 398
- Management reporting dashboards and cloud accounting 359
- Incorporating doctors 339
- IFA income recognition & reporting 273
- Form P55 in year tax repayment claim for non-resident 253
- Are subsistence claims firmly attached to the 24 month rule ? 242
- When is sale recognised in an agency who receives commission? 200