Capital allowance for classrooms

Capital allowance for classrooms

Didn't find your answer?

The situation is that the client rents what was an empty warehouse. The warehouse is then converted into classrooms and workshops, to enable the teaching of 14 to 16 year old students. We are looking at around a £50k spending for the classrooms etc.

So what would you class the breeze blocks and stud walling etc to be. Yes the building has been improved, so it could be argued that buildings allowance could be applied, but the client does not own the building. Yet if the client moved out, the classrooms etc would have to be removed prior to vacating the property.

I had a similar situation many years ago, but my grey cells are fading slowly and forgotten how I got round this one.

Replies (7)

Please login or register to join the discussion.

avatar
By blok
15th Mar 2012 15:35

.

Generally speaking a building or structure is capital.  It is unlikely that the building or structure will be moveable and no allowances will be due.

There may be some allowances to be had on items fixed to the structure depending on the nature of the items.  These items could qualify as plant and equipment or as integral features. 

You need to research into what qualifies and consider whether these items are functional within the trade. 

Legal ownership of the land or building is not important for the purposes you are talking about.

 

Thanks (1)
d
By puzzel
15th Mar 2012 16:50

So in the end

when the business moves premises, the initial investment would be classed as a loss and can only be off-set against any future capital gains.

I am aware that some integral feature may be classed as plant, it was more on the internal structure that I was trying to get around.

Thanks (0)
avatar
By David Massey
15th Mar 2012 18:48

It's even worse than that
I fear you may not even be able to claim a capital loss. The walls etc will become part of the building and as the client only rents their interest in the property may well be a wasting asset. The allowable expenditure may have to be restricted in the same way as a short lease.

David

Thanks (0)
avatar
By blok
15th Mar 2012 20:39

.
David is right. There is no tax relief on capital leasehold improvements that don't attract capital allowances.

Thanks (0)
avatar
By newmoon
16th Mar 2012 05:16

And when knocking them down
The costs of returning the building to original state when vacated at the end of the lease will be allowable I think, looking at the lifespan of this project.
Reading this post about the building work done, makes me wonder if the tax considerations are one reason why movable partitions are popular.
Another option would have been for the landlord to undertake the work and recover the cost through rent - is this too late to arrange? The landlord would at least get the expense allowable for capital gains relief eventually.

Thanks (0)
avatar
By David Massey
16th Mar 2012 08:51

RTZ Oil & Gas v Ellis
Unfortunately, if I recall correctly, where there have been capital alterations, the costs of reinstating an asset to its original state also have to be treated as capital; so there would be no deduction available for the costs of taking down the walls.

This does look like one of those rare trades where it could genuinely be argued that partition walls would have to be moved for the purposes of the trade (class sizes and the demands of the curriula may change every term which in turn require changes to the teaching rooms.) and bluemoon makes a valid point there. I think we'll always have the problem persuading clients to consider the tax before spending this sort of money rather than leaving us to try and sort it out after the event.

David

Thanks (0)
avatar
By agillies
25th Mar 2015 11:13

Tax

Try business property renovation - good chance it qualifies - 100% tax relief

Thanks (0)