Hi
A client has 3 employments, lets call them A, B and C.
The salary for A is £22,000, for B £30,000 and for C £6,000.
I applied for class 1 deferment and was hoping to get this for employments B and C. I was unsure if B would get it due to the amount straddling the threshold of £42,475 and, as suspected, they haven't granted it but I don't really know why. Is it because it straddles the limit or am I just making this up in my head?!
Only C obtained a deferment.
Can anyone provide me with a quick reason as to why the outcome is the way it is?
Thanks
Replies (1)
Please login or register to join the discussion.
sounds more like an exam question.....
but at a guess presumably because none of the 3 employments exceed the upper threshold, C has been chosen because it quite clearly will all be above the upper threshold...(when added to the others). This means that a refund can be issued in respect of one of the other employments at the end of the year (if apporpriate)....in the end I presume the revenue wouldn't give a further deferement because the risk of non/underpayment then lies with them rather than the employee which is quite an understandable stance to take I guess.