Crash repair costs .

Crash repair costs .

Didn't find your answer?

Employee crashes into back of member of publics [MOP] car....minor damage

Rather than going thru insurance co [losing no claims etc and having renewal loaded]....company pays the MOP a lump sum [estimated repair costs plus inconvenience cost].

Is this an allowable business expense??

Replies (7)

Please login or register to join the discussion.

avatar
By User deleted
19th Nov 2015 21:12

Probably

But you almost certainly have to disclose to the insurer anyway.

Someone hit my car when I was stationary at a set of lights; they paid up for repairs.  I was advised that I needed to disclose this on my insurance renewal and the insurer hiked my premium!

 

 

 

Thanks (0)
Replying to NYB:
Routemaster image
By tom123
21st Nov 2015 08:59

That is shocking

Phil Yaboots wrote:

But you almost certainly have to disclose to the insurer anyway.

Someone hit my car when I was stationary at a set of lights; they paid up for repairs.  I was advised that I needed to disclose this on my insurance renewal and the insurer hiked my premium!

 

 

 

It is quite shocking that a 'non fault' accident affects your premium - but nothing suprises me with the world of insurance I suppose.

Thanks (0)
By cheekychappy
19th Nov 2015 23:25

There is a wormhole on Accountingweb that seems to swallow information.

It can be deducted as a business expense, presumably because this will be a BIK for the employee.

Thanks (0)
avatar
By Cant Add Up
20th Nov 2015 00:21

To clarify it was a company car that crashed into MOP car.

Thanks (0)
By cheekychappy
20th Nov 2015 07:51

Ah ... it was a company car.

The wormhole strikes again.

Thanks (0)
Replying to Truthsayer:
avatar
By Cant Add Up
20th Nov 2015 18:18

er..

cheekychappy wrote:
Ah ... it was a company car. The wormhole strikes again.

Are you attempting to answer the question?? 

 

Thanks (0)
Replying to Wanderer:
Stepurhan
By stepurhan
21st Nov 2015 10:19

Details important

Cant Add Up wrote:

cheekychappy wrote:
Ah ... it was a company car. The wormhole strikes again.

Are you attempting to answer the question??

cheekychappy is simply pointing out that the car being a company car is rather an important detail. One that should have been included in the question.

If the car had been the employee's private car, then there were potentially other issues arising. That is why it is important to include all details at the start. Respondents are likely to have guessed that it was a company car, but responses based on guesses may prove misleading.

Thanks (0)