HMRC have some guidance on waivers see below:-
I have a few commetns/queries on this:-
Point 1 has been well documented in previous comments
Point 2 However, seems to indicate that where there are continuous waivers, then a cumulative test is done. If I'm reading this right, then the 'waived' element of the dividend can never be distributed, even in future periods, as this would be seen as 'income shifting'. (Mathematically, this could be the case.) So if the waived element is left in reserves, and it can be proved that this is the case, is this a defence against HMRC applying settlements legisaltion. Even in the event of continuous waivers?
Also, if the waived element was distributed say 10 years later, how could HMRC prove this, as tax return etc information is legally able to be destroyed, long before the 10years is up?
Point 5 Under independant taxation how would any shareholder know if another shareholder would benefit? As there is no legal obligation to disclose your tax affairs to another individual! Including husband and wife. How do HMRC get round that one?
I've waffled on this but it would be interesting to know the answer.
TSEM4225 - Dividend waiver - when Settlements legislation may apply
Not all dividend waivers are vulnerable to challenge. Where a company with few shareholders declares a dividend when one or more of the shareholders has waived their right to a dividend in circumstances where other shareholders may benefit, it is possible the Settlements legislation could apply. You should look out for the following factors, which would indicate that the Settlements legislation is likely to apply.
1.The level of retained profits, including the retained profits of subsidiary companies, is insufficient to allow the same rate of dividend to be paid on all issued share capital.
2.Although there are sufficient retained profits to pay the same rate of dividend per share for the year in question, there has been a succession of waivers over several years where the total dividends payable in the absence of the waivers exceed accumulated realised profits.
3.There is any other evidence, which suggests that the same rate would not have been paid on all the issued shares in the absence of the waiver.
4.The non-waiving shareholders are persons whom the waiving shareholder can reasonably be regarded as wishing to benefit by the waiver.
5.The non-waiving shareholder would pay less tax on the dividend than the waiving shareholder
- reporting salary? 22 1
- Multiple PAYE Schemes 92 2
- Childcare Vouchers 118 2
- Sale of shares and ER 80 3
- Enforcing A CCJ 172 4
- Quarterly PAYE 46 1
- Value pricing 452 15
- SDLT - transfer of land into newco 108 4
- Personal Service Company 94 2
- Employment Allowance - Doctors Private Secretaries 91 1
- SA Return issued after P800 received 115 5
- More than one Employment Allowance ? 113 1
- Auto enrolment 260 4
- What password safe app does anyone recommend? 1,179 25
- Sage Payroll 190 8
- Laptop purchase 1,159 19
- VAT on Gaming Machines 245 1
- Payroll software : RTI submissions 132 3
- VAT 99 1
- Auto enrolment 335 5
- Residential Property Purchase Above £750K 753
- Using Sage with Sofa Categories 513
- Does anyone have an unwanted ICAEW wooden plaque? 384
- One man Company and closing payroll scheme as none paid 361
- Goods shipped inter EU and VAT Reporting 271
- Sage 200 and Access Dimensions reviews 209
- Non-Resident Director - UK Tax Position? 209
- transferring simply accounting 2010 from xp to windows 7 190
- Director Loan account operation 182
- vat return 156