HMRC have some guidance on waivers see below:-
I have a few commetns/queries on this:-
Point 1 has been well documented in previous comments
Point 2 However, seems to indicate that where there are continuous waivers, then a cumulative test is done. If I'm reading this right, then the 'waived' element of the dividend can never be distributed, even in future periods, as this would be seen as 'income shifting'. (Mathematically, this could be the case.) So if the waived element is left in reserves, and it can be proved that this is the case, is this a defence against HMRC applying settlements legisaltion. Even in the event of continuous waivers?
Also, if the waived element was distributed say 10 years later, how could HMRC prove this, as tax return etc information is legally able to be destroyed, long before the 10years is up?
Point 5 Under independant taxation how would any shareholder know if another shareholder would benefit? As there is no legal obligation to disclose your tax affairs to another individual! Including husband and wife. How do HMRC get round that one?
I've waffled on this but it would be interesting to know the answer.
TSEM4225 - Dividend waiver - when Settlements legislation may apply
Not all dividend waivers are vulnerable to challenge. Where a company with few shareholders declares a dividend when one or more of the shareholders has waived their right to a dividend in circumstances where other shareholders may benefit, it is possible the Settlements legislation could apply. You should look out for the following factors, which would indicate that the Settlements legislation is likely to apply.
1.The level of retained profits, including the retained profits of subsidiary companies, is insufficient to allow the same rate of dividend to be paid on all issued share capital.
2.Although there are sufficient retained profits to pay the same rate of dividend per share for the year in question, there has been a succession of waivers over several years where the total dividends payable in the absence of the waivers exceed accumulated realised profits.
3.There is any other evidence, which suggests that the same rate would not have been paid on all the issued shares in the absence of the waiver.
4.The non-waiving shareholders are persons whom the waiving shareholder can reasonably be regarded as wishing to benefit by the waiver.
5.The non-waiving shareholder would pay less tax on the dividend than the waiving shareholder
- Finding a Company UTR for a newly formed company 118 1
- Recomendations for a purchase order management book please? 121 1
- Instant CPD offer 284 4
- Cash basis 515 13
- Income from rent charged to business 125 2
- payroll software 367 3
- CIMA accountant wants to start consultancy 440 5
- Statutory sick pay 308 4
- Dividend in specie 368 9
- Complicated Company car purchase 220 2
- Ltd Company Buying Own Shares and Transferring Assets 175 3
- Retail vat schemes for a restaurant 145 1
- Rental Property W&T And Equipment 273 1
- Legislation access for part-time sole practitioner? 294 1
- Ownership of land - declaration of trust 168 3
- Fee base v staff ratio 386 6
- NIC thresholds - two employments 1,857 27
- Statutory Accounts - Dividends Disclosure Note 335 3
- Unincorporated organistion ceasing to exist 258 2
- Gift in kind to charity by company: services 109 1
- Skandia using wrong address 575
- FHL, period of grace and Entrepreneur's relief 307
- Does anyone use PS Financials accounting software out there? 307
- Employee rewards 289
- Gift of reversion and lease into trust by two different people - later PPR 256
- EPS Analysis - Change to EURO 228
- Etax Australian 187
- LLP in Construction Industry 155
- Selling On Amazon & Calculatign Prices/Vat 132
- Interest and late payment charges HMRC 131