HMRC have some guidance on waivers see below:-
I have a few commetns/queries on this:-
Point 1 has been well documented in previous comments
Point 2 However, seems to indicate that where there are continuous waivers, then a cumulative test is done. If I'm reading this right, then the 'waived' element of the dividend can never be distributed, even in future periods, as this would be seen as 'income shifting'. (Mathematically, this could be the case.) So if the waived element is left in reserves, and it can be proved that this is the case, is this a defence against HMRC applying settlements legisaltion. Even in the event of continuous waivers?
Also, if the waived element was distributed say 10 years later, how could HMRC prove this, as tax return etc information is legally able to be destroyed, long before the 10years is up?
Point 5 Under independant taxation how would any shareholder know if another shareholder would benefit? As there is no legal obligation to disclose your tax affairs to another individual! Including husband and wife. How do HMRC get round that one?
I've waffled on this but it would be interesting to know the answer.
TSEM4225 - Dividend waiver - when Settlements legislation may apply
Not all dividend waivers are vulnerable to challenge. Where a company with few shareholders declares a dividend when one or more of the shareholders has waived their right to a dividend in circumstances where other shareholders may benefit, it is possible the Settlements legislation could apply. You should look out for the following factors, which would indicate that the Settlements legislation is likely to apply.
1.The level of retained profits, including the retained profits of subsidiary companies, is insufficient to allow the same rate of dividend to be paid on all issued share capital.
2.Although there are sufficient retained profits to pay the same rate of dividend per share for the year in question, there has been a succession of waivers over several years where the total dividends payable in the absence of the waivers exceed accumulated realised profits.
3.There is any other evidence, which suggests that the same rate would not have been paid on all the issued shares in the absence of the waiver.
4.The non-waiving shareholders are persons whom the waiving shareholder can reasonably be regarded as wishing to benefit by the waiver.
5.The non-waiving shareholder would pay less tax on the dividend than the waiving shareholder
- Non-Resident Director - UK Tax Position? 331 1
- VAT Option to tax 352 8
- Sage payroll 638 14
- Late P800 demand shows later year? 275 16
- recovery of S455 on informal winding 254 3
- Client has been fined by HMRC 799 18
- LLP members share of profits 463 27
- VAT BOX 6 & 7 errors 71 4
- Consortium relief and bad debts 83 4
- HMRC request for Sage Back Up 2,056 22
- Entrepreneurs Relief 99 3
- PAYE coding notice - deliberate misstatement 1,016 17
- Laptop purchase 1,571 21
- CVA guidance 107 2
- BEST CPD COURSE 115 1
- Total cost of employment 286 3
- Accountancy software for an imac 267 6
- PAYE Coding Notices 525 10
- directors loan movements and repayments 245 3
- VAT registration for "co-operative" formed to provide flood defences 76 1
- Residential Property Purchase Above £750K 891
- Using Sage with Sofa Categories 625
- Free Tax Legislation? 383
- Director Loan account operation 381
- transferring simply accounting 2010 from xp to windows 7 307
- Understanding the implications of January 2015 VAT changes for downloads on threshold for VAT registration 305
- Sage 200 and Access Dimensions reviews 279
- Paye procedures for CVA 210
- rent-a-room allowance for part of the year 202
- HMRC Second Income Campaign - not so much a question as heads up 162