HMRC have some guidance on waivers see below:-
I have a few commetns/queries on this:-
Point 1 has been well documented in previous comments
Point 2 However, seems to indicate that where there are continuous waivers, then a cumulative test is done. If I'm reading this right, then the 'waived' element of the dividend can never be distributed, even in future periods, as this would be seen as 'income shifting'. (Mathematically, this could be the case.) So if the waived element is left in reserves, and it can be proved that this is the case, is this a defence against HMRC applying settlements legisaltion. Even in the event of continuous waivers?
Also, if the waived element was distributed say 10 years later, how could HMRC prove this, as tax return etc information is legally able to be destroyed, long before the 10years is up?
Point 5 Under independant taxation how would any shareholder know if another shareholder would benefit? As there is no legal obligation to disclose your tax affairs to another individual! Including husband and wife. How do HMRC get round that one?
I've waffled on this but it would be interesting to know the answer.
TSEM4225 - Dividend waiver - when Settlements legislation may apply
Not all dividend waivers are vulnerable to challenge. Where a company with few shareholders declares a dividend when one or more of the shareholders has waived their right to a dividend in circumstances where other shareholders may benefit, it is possible the Settlements legislation could apply. You should look out for the following factors, which would indicate that the Settlements legislation is likely to apply.
1.The level of retained profits, including the retained profits of subsidiary companies, is insufficient to allow the same rate of dividend to be paid on all issued share capital.
2.Although there are sufficient retained profits to pay the same rate of dividend per share for the year in question, there has been a succession of waivers over several years where the total dividends payable in the absence of the waivers exceed accumulated realised profits.
3.There is any other evidence, which suggests that the same rate would not have been paid on all the issued shares in the absence of the waiver.
4.The non-waiving shareholders are persons whom the waiving shareholder can reasonably be regarded as wishing to benefit by the waiver.
5.The non-waiving shareholder would pay less tax on the dividend than the waiving shareholder
- Help with Mortgage Application? 475 7
- planning to be self employed bookkeeper what do i need to do before i start? 163 3
- Any Scottish members out there? 7,613 283
- Disclosure of pending convertible loan notes? 212 10
- Standard 'email' template system 875 14
- New Client in dispute with old accountant 459 9
- Shutting down a company with creditors 1,027 14
- How to complete annual VAT return online? 215 4
- Irish VAT Deferred payment 87 1
- Circular shareholding 229 6
- Starting as sole trader from abroad 188 6
- business card address 299 8
- VAT relief eligibilty for charity buying minibus 213 2
- Declined for business bank account 226 4
- Loan to a related company 101 1
- Artificially reducing profits by bonus accrual 656 26
- Repairs after a rental business ends 331 10
- Can anyone recommend a good document scanner? 267 8
- property rental income split 126 1
- Expenses of overseas employment 137 2
- Raiders of the Lost Tax File 1,112
- Chartered Accountant in County Down N.Ireland 366
- IPP (International Pension Plan) income 300
- National Insurance 269
- valuation of intangible asset FRS10 and FRS20 239
- Payments on account coded out?? 228
- Cass 5 FCA Client Money Software recomendation 221
- Non Resident 186
- Unnecessary S9A Enquiries 179
- Franchise income and costs 176