HMRC have some guidance on waivers see below:-
I have a few commetns/queries on this:-
Point 1 has been well documented in previous comments
Point 2 However, seems to indicate that where there are continuous waivers, then a cumulative test is done. If I'm reading this right, then the 'waived' element of the dividend can never be distributed, even in future periods, as this would be seen as 'income shifting'. (Mathematically, this could be the case.) So if the waived element is left in reserves, and it can be proved that this is the case, is this a defence against HMRC applying settlements legisaltion. Even in the event of continuous waivers?
Also, if the waived element was distributed say 10 years later, how could HMRC prove this, as tax return etc information is legally able to be destroyed, long before the 10years is up?
Point 5 Under independant taxation how would any shareholder know if another shareholder would benefit? As there is no legal obligation to disclose your tax affairs to another individual! Including husband and wife. How do HMRC get round that one?
I've waffled on this but it would be interesting to know the answer.
TSEM4225 - Dividend waiver - when Settlements legislation may apply
Not all dividend waivers are vulnerable to challenge. Where a company with few shareholders declares a dividend when one or more of the shareholders has waived their right to a dividend in circumstances where other shareholders may benefit, it is possible the Settlements legislation could apply. You should look out for the following factors, which would indicate that the Settlements legislation is likely to apply.
1.The level of retained profits, including the retained profits of subsidiary companies, is insufficient to allow the same rate of dividend to be paid on all issued share capital.
2.Although there are sufficient retained profits to pay the same rate of dividend per share for the year in question, there has been a succession of waivers over several years where the total dividends payable in the absence of the waivers exceed accumulated realised profits.
3.There is any other evidence, which suggests that the same rate would not have been paid on all the issued shares in the absence of the waiver.
4.The non-waiving shareholders are persons whom the waiving shareholder can reasonably be regarded as wishing to benefit by the waiver.
5.The non-waiving shareholder would pay less tax on the dividend than the waiving shareholder
- Accounts production software license expiry & possible alternatives 280 6
- Capital gain? 42 2
- Recharge for private use of a company car 344 8
- How could I be identified for VAT purposes in UK? 407 8
- Are clients getting more stupid? 1,223 20
- vat help for catering concession 266 10
- IHT dilemma 1,148 17
- Tax return software for remote working 221 3
- CGT 325 14
- Problems with Sage 50 Payroll v21(2015) pension module 311 1
- Interest paid to non-UK company - Deduction 102 2
- Compliance check 499 13
- sole trader accountant 776 14
- Entrepreneurs Relief 394 15
- Capital Allowances and Building Improvements 599 21
- More AE! 485 11
- How to classify an asset 150 3
- Ceasing in membership of ATT 281 2
- when a charity makes a donation.... 179 4
- EU eservices VAT change imminent 130 2
- Auto enrolment excuses 1,074
- Feedback on accounts production software for IFRS 776
- Add T&Cs to Sales Order in Sage 459
- Digita Hosted Software 277
- Call Centre Data Costs 246
- Are any of you agents for doctors? 218
- Credit where credit's due....... 210
- Buying goods in US and selling them to company in US 199
- Married Couples Allowance wasted? 182
- Director phone costs 144