Do P11Ds still need to be submitted when no salaries in year?

Posted by petersaxton PM | on Wed, 30/05/2012 - 16:55 1449 50 comments | report

I have had some clients who are employers but there was no reason to pay a salary to the sole director. If there are expenses paid to a director that would usually go on a P11D does a P11D need to be submitted? I have looked on the 480, P11D and P11D Guide but I can't see any mention of what is needed. Does anybody have a link?

Comments

There are 50 comments. Login or register to view them.

Did you actually read the 480?

BKD | Wed, 30/05/2012 - 17:58

From first principles I'm

HeavyMetalMike | Wed, 30/05/2012 - 21:51

Yes, I read it.

petersaxton | Thu, 31/05/2012 - 07:25

Not logical to me

petersaxton | Thu, 31/05/2012 - 07:36

I'm being lazy

BKD | Thu, 31/05/2012 - 12:48

1.7

petersaxton | Thu, 31/05/2012 - 08:22

That was my question

BKD | Thu, 31/05/2012 - 09:08

No employer scheme

petersaxton | Thu, 31/05/2012 - 09:32

You're not making much sense

BKD | Thu, 31/05/2012 - 09:47

All gone silent?

BKD | Thu, 31/05/2012 - 15:09

The anwser is.....

tonycourt | Thu, 31/05/2012 - 15:33

Thanks, Tony

BKD | Thu, 31/05/2012 - 17:16

Per HMRC

petersaxton | Thu, 31/05/2012 - 18:14

That is correct

BKD | Thu, 31/05/2012 - 18:35

PAYE schemes

petersaxton | Thu, 31/05/2012 - 18:46

One word

BKD | Thu, 31/05/2012 - 19:04

How?

petersaxton | Thu, 31/05/2012 - 19:42

?

BKD | Thu, 31/05/2012 - 19:52

Blood out of a stone

petersaxton | Thu, 31/05/2012 - 19:57

Imformation

BKD | Thu, 31/05/2012 - 20:24

What words do you use?

petersaxton | Thu, 31/05/2012 - 20:27

I think I understand now

petersaxton | Thu, 31/05/2012 - 20:31

Back foot?

BKD | Thu, 31/05/2012 - 21:04

Scarey

petersaxton | Thu, 31/05/2012 - 21:27

Simples

BKD | Thu, 31/05/2012 - 22:01

There's opinions and opinions

petersaxton | Thu, 31/05/2012 - 23:26

By your analysis

BKD | Fri, 01/06/2012 - 07:58

Further to our discussions

petersaxton | Fri, 01/06/2012 - 08:01

That makes no sense at all

BKD | Fri, 01/06/2012 - 08:18

Not sufficient care

petersaxton | Fri, 01/06/2012 - 08:23

Isn't it obvious?

petersaxton | Fri, 01/06/2012 - 08:33

And how ...

BKD | Fri, 01/06/2012 - 09:05

Client base

petersaxton | Fri, 01/06/2012 - 10:14

.

BKD | Fri, 01/06/2012 - 13:30

Says it all

petersaxton | Fri, 01/06/2012 - 14:19

@ Peter

andy.partridge | Fri, 01/06/2012 - 15:15

Relevance

petersaxton | Fri, 01/06/2012 - 16:43

Accusations

BKD | Fri, 01/06/2012 - 21:56

Relevance?

petersaxton | Fri, 01/06/2012 - 22:20

Never Mind Directors

thomas34 | Sat, 02/06/2012 - 09:05

You've answered your own point

BKD | Sat, 02/06/2012 - 10:00

Sledgehammer to break a nut

petersaxton | Sat, 02/06/2012 - 10:26

90% of the work still needed

petersaxton | Sat, 02/06/2012 - 10:29

Procedures

BKD | Sat, 02/06/2012 - 10:42

Simple exercise?

petersaxton | Sat, 02/06/2012 - 10:50

Missed the point

BKD | Sat, 02/06/2012 - 10:58

Stark contrast

petersaxton | Sat, 02/06/2012 - 11:15

Casting doubts

BKD | Sat, 02/06/2012 - 11:36

Never give an answer that might embarrass you

petersaxton | Sat, 02/06/2012 - 12:27

Websites

petersaxton | Sat, 02/06/2012 - 12:54