EBT / Stamp Duty schemes 'too good to be true'
A friend of mine bought into an EBT scheme a couple of years ago.
The way they sold it to him was that it was insured by a certain well known insurer and if he ever had to pay any tax then this would be covered by the scheme insurance (seems too good to be true!)
Within a couple of days of the EBT legislation being announced, he received communications from the promoter confirming that the new rules would not apply to this scheme (it seemed almost too soon after the introduction of new rules for any in depth research to be done by them). My friend is still comfortable using it, given the apparent insurance already mentioned.
I am quite concerned that he is not quite seeing the whole picture on this, and possibly being taken for a ride.
The reason this has come to mind now is that I have also seen 'insured' stamp duty avoidance schemes (based on subsale relief) that are saying that the budget this week hasn't changed anything!
Has anyone had any similar experiences?
- Claiming annual pension allowance top up in SATR 177 2
- Leaving the VAT FRS Scheme or trying to stay as long as possible? 225 3
- Xerocon 2016 1,241 35
- Mortgage Reference 562 8
- Rounding errors on CT600 266 7
- Insovent companies 889 19
- New Build 223 1
- Entrepreneurs' Relief upon sale of a cash rich company 2,300 48
- BrightPay quirks 242 2
- HMRC now overriding SA bank repayment details on tax returns 813 20
- Website Content 194 1
- Personal Tax 635 12
- Starting band for savings - for 2014/2015 207 1
- USA Tax Query 322 2
- Website costs (intangible assets) tax relief 443 5
- last minute request 660 6
- buying asset and settling vendor's debt 373 6
- Posting invoices with balance brought forward 407 7
- Disengagement Help! 1,746 25
- Is HMRC Basic Tools basically wrong? 988 6