Exchange rate fee in using PayPal for foreign payments
I use PayPal to pay a lot of my foreign invoices.
When I log an invoice in my accounting system I use the exchange rate as per XE. com at the invoice date to convert it into British pounds.
I then make the foreign payment through PayPal. They convert the foreign payment into British pounds using their rate.
I therefore have a difference in what I recorded the invoice for in GBP in my accounting system and what it has cost me to make that foreign payment using PayPal. At the moment I just move the difference to Forex movement on the profit and loss.
Is this the correct treatment because I know PayPal charges a 2.5% exchange conversion fee so technically not all the exchange difference is down to the exchange rate movement. Some of the movement is down to the fee PayPal charge to convert the currency.
- Fixed asset registers 310 10
- What is the best blog for practitioners to follow? 366 7
- Tech Champion of the Year 267 6
- Xmas party 140 1
- Just because it's Friday 313 6
- Playstation 4 - Allowable expense or not? 3,369 66
- Inheritance Tax - Simple Question 164 4
- Non-resident employer & employee 109 4
- Capital Allowances 166 4
- equipment rental 221 10
- Acquisition by company 126 5
- Non sequitur 546 7
- Client using boyfriend's personal account 1,509 23
- R&D on products not sold 101 3
- Distance between Postcodes in Excel 942 13
- Under Cash Accounting rules how do I account for a credit note issued outside the Corp Tax period? 199 4
- Quirky thread of the year: Community Awards 650 9
- Transfer of land to family members 110 2
- The complete uselessness of the British banking system 600 11
- The process of issuing dividend? 229 6
- Desperately seeking Susan, Sam or anyone with any other name 1,370
- Darwinpay Partnership Assessment 437
- Alphabet shares 243
- Agent fees to sell business 231
- ACCA continuity of practice arrangement needed 230
- Charge out rates in London 185
- How to reclaim VAT for a non-EC UK visitor 170
- which entity 151
- UK tax regime 'attractive' to investors, says KPMG 142
- confusion about 141