Fate of the 50p income tax rate
During the past week or so, the AccountingWEB editors' in-box has been swamped with messages and press statements putting forward arguments for and against the 50% tax rate band.
Is this all an artificial bit of political froth generated to fill the silly season vacuum, or is it a vital debate in which the views of AccountingWEB's members need to be brought to the Chancellor and business secretary's attention?
I'm concerned that in this instance my habitual cynicism may have clouded my news judgement and I've ignored the comments from the likes of Ernst & Young, UK200Group and Richard Murphy to concentrate on other issues. Do many people here feel strongly about the issue and want to go into it in more detail?
As a quick overview, here are some of the points pro & con:
Srap the 50% band
- "There’s not much point in having taxes that are very economically inefficient." Chancellor George Osborne, Radio 4 Today programme, 16 August. The chancellor has reportedly asked HMRC to evaluate the impact of the rate on Self Assesment takings after its first year. The findings should be ready in time for the Budget.
- "It punishes wealth creation by imposing on entrepreneurs and business people a marginal tax rate in excess of 50% once national insurance contributions are added in... This is particularly damaging when the UK needs to create new businesses in new industries and promote growth by small companies, which can grow fast. It applies to just 1% of taxpayers, who already pay 24% of all income taxes."
- "A significant disincentive to doing business in the UK, providing a barrier to new business owners and executives from coming here, whilst also driving existing higher earners to foreign shores." Patrick Stevens, Ernst & Young
- "If something is not bringing in a profit and it cannot be made to do so, there is no point in continuing... In business and economic terms, if the 50% tax rate is not covering its costs then it should be scrapped but politically that's a totally different question!" Jonathan Russell, UK200Group
- "With National Insurance, top taxpayers pay over 50 per cent which means they are working more for the taxman than themselves... These high earners are often the creators of businesses and therefore jobs for those who do not have the same talent, management skills or qualifications. Do we really want to punish them for their successes and risk losing this hot-bed of talent?" John Kelly, Square One Financial Planning
Keep the 50% band
- "By definition most small businesses aren’t going to get in the top 1% of income earners – there are about 4m small businesses in the UK right now, at least (over 1m companies and 3m or so self employed). All small businesses that will grow fast will be limited companies – enjoying effective tax rates of around 20% or so, utterly undermining this argument." Richard Murphy, TaxResearch blog.
- "According to recent articles, a 1% cut in income tax would cost the Exchequer £4.5bn. So these economists think that putting £10bn into the hands of 300,000 already-very-wealthy people is a better recipe for the well-being of the country than (say) cutting EVERYONE’s income tax rates by 2p…" ChrisM, on Murphy's blog.
- "The government is committed to a competitive tax system, but in reducing the deficit, we have always been clear that those with the broadest shoulders should carry the greatest burden." A Treasury spokesman reaffirming the government's commitment to the 50p tax rate on Tuesday 7 September.
Let me know if you're interested in this topic and what you think. If I've been mistaken about the significance, I'll make amends with a more detailed study of the arguments, and perhaps put it to a community poll. As always, your guidance is appreciated.
- Set-off interest received against interest paid? 57 1
- VAT and selling on Amazon 40 1
- Bank account frozen 110 2
- VAT on Second Hand Touring Caravans 193 5
- Is renting a house deductable 241 9
- Do you use commercial software for Self Assessment tax returns? 858 26
- Writing Website Content 655 23
- Charity Account-independent examiner 164 2
- Share valuation upon death of shareholder 107 2
- Pension contributions and childcare vouchers 163 4
- Best way to convert Sage data to VT Transaction+ 237 2
- Badges of trade 343 6
- Can HMRC charge penalties now for a tax return due for 2005? 259 4
- CT61 Interest - Is it voluntary? 124 2
- owner paying for purchases and other expenses from personal account 151 3
- AIA 345 5
- Seeking advice: Charging VAT on commission on my commission! 290 8
- CT600 X ERROR in relation to Tangible Assets 212 9
- Capital Goods Scheme 214 7
- Only pref shares. Does it matter 324 7
- Any knowledge of salesorder.com 450
- Could and would anyone here carry out a hot file review of some non statutory audit work please? 419
- Electric Car 353
- S222 Charge 282
- Corporation tax penalties and fines on the CT600 262
- IP trans to holding company 218
- Payroll Manager - tax code for starter declaration 'C' 199
- Car used both in a partnership and sole trader business - how to claim capital allowances? 192
- Career advice needed regarding accouting systems analysis 162
- Simple Partnership Agreement Template 158