Hare brained tax scheme

Usual limited company husband and wife setup, however with a twist.

The wife lives with the child in their home in Brunei, and acts as company administrator, etc. She's very well qualified having an accountancy background (albeit not-UK) and holds an MBA. All courtesy of the apparently very generous Brunei government.

The wife left the UK to bring the children up in Brunei last year and has completed a P85 and got the necessary "NT" Tax code for the work which she currently does for the company. All perfectly standard and above board as far as it goes.

Where it gets a bit tricky is that the husband (interim HR director) has worked up a scheme whereby he thinks that paying himself only enough to cover the overheads of a small flat in East London, food and beer, he can legitimately pay the entire remainder of the companies funds to his wife as salary suffering only PAYE, Employees NI and Employers NI on his small scale earnings (probably about 15k per year).

As all of the companies earnings will be paid out in tax deductable salaries, there would be no corporation tax to pay as the overall P&L would be effectively zero.

Husband sole director, holding a 51/49 shareholding with wife who is just an employee (Office Administrator).

My first temptation was to say "B*gg*r off", but IR35 and moral implications aside, I'm struggling to quote HMRC chapter and verse why they can't do this.

 

Comments
There are 38 comments. Login or register to view them.

Wholly & exclusively?

afairpo |
afairpo's picture

Will the wife actually be doing any work?

stephenkendrew |

Wife already does all of the paperwork for the company.

frustratedwithhmrc |
frustratedwithhmrc's picture

.

blok |
blok's picture

It doesn't appear that settlements legislation would apply.

frustratedwithhmrc |
frustratedwithhmrc's picture

Commercial arrangement

0103953 |
0103953's picture

.

blok |
blok's picture

What are the boundaries of a "commercial arrangement"?

frustratedwithhmrc |
frustratedwithhmrc's picture

Doesn't stop the banks ....

Old Greying Accountant |
Old Greying Accountant's picture

We wouldn't be having this conversation if she was UK resident.

frustratedwithhmrc |
frustratedwithhmrc's picture

.

blok |
blok's picture

I've got all of the paper work from HMRC showing non-resident.

frustratedwithhmrc |
frustratedwithhmrc's picture

Wholly an exclusively

foxtrot |

why

uktaxpal |

We've reviewed the IR35 and enough boxes are checked to ignore.

frustratedwithhmrc |
frustratedwithhmrc's picture

Market rate of pay

Paul Scholes |
Paul Scholes's picture

Salary re CT deduction fine

Marion Hayes |

you need to look at the level of his reward too

dbowleracca |
dbowleracca's picture

co res

uktaxpal |

No - This is most certainly a UK resident role

frustratedwithhmrc |
frustratedwithhmrc's picture

No substantive argument on here

accountant_87 |

Assurance

uktaxpal |

I don't know anything about

Mike Bassy |

Despite the pro's and con's of the argument, I'm going to say no

frustratedwithhmrc |
frustratedwithhmrc's picture

I was never very good at being one of HMRC's sheeple.

frustratedwithhmrc |
frustratedwithhmrc's picture

@ Mike Bassey

0103953 |
0103953's picture

respect argument

Mike Bassy |

Certainly there are "grey areas" in taxation law and practice.

frustratedwithhmrc |
frustratedwithhmrc's picture

Is there really a "Hang 'em and Flog 'em" brigade?

frustratedwithhmrc |
frustratedwithhmrc's picture

future developments

uktaxpal |

Spotlights

DMGbus |
DMGbus's picture

I can't believe...

George Attazder |
George Attazder's picture

Very true George

frustratedwithhmrc |
frustratedwithhmrc's picture

May I point out the crucial

Mike Bassy |

Political decisions?

uktaxpal |

Comparing my practice with Huitson? Well thanks a lot!

frustratedwithhmrc |
frustratedwithhmrc's picture

Nothing crucial about "might"

dwgw |

.

blok |
blok's picture