New payment scheme for family therapists forcing them onto PAYE
A fried has posed the following dilemma. I don't know the answer but thought that AccountingWeb readers may be able to help.
Both my children are taught at home as they are autistic. We are given funding by our local London borough and pay teachers/therapists to educate the children. The money is paid quarterly: I submit a signed statement from each of the therapists as to how much they received and I’m reimbursed for the lump sum up to an agreed amount (unfortunately insufficient – but that’s another story!). All the therapists are self-employed and fulfil that criteria as far as I’m aware (in that they don’t get paid holiday or sick leave; work for other families besides our own; hours per week vary from therapist to therapist and week to week but ranges from 9 hours to 16 hours; they provide their own work equipment; they have to pay for their own training). Although I’m not responsible for the therapists tax returns, none have had any problems about being accepted as self-employed by the IR.
We have just been informed that the way we receive our payments is going to be changed: the money will still come from the borough but in the form of a ‘personal budget’. We have been told that under this new payment scheme all therapists employed by ourselves must be employees, and therefore subject to PAYE. The My contact at the London borough say they have discussed the matter with HMRC and that was their conclusion: no argument! Everything else remains the same, we still have to find the therapists, negotiate pay etc.
Leaving aside the additional cost of this, I’m concerned from the therapist viewpoint that if their work for us is constituted as PAYE, then the IR can argue that if they work for anyone else on the same basis, that should also be PAYE.
My question is: do you think it’s worth trying to argue that because the circumstances of their work hasn’t altered one iota, they should still be entitled to remain self-employed (in other words where the money comes from is irrelevant – what is relevant is the terms of their service)? Or does the London Boriugh have us over a barrel as ultimately they are paying the money to us: and if they decide that anybody who works for us with their money is PAYE, then so be it?
- Signed accounts for a lender 226 10
- Goodie bag 2,349 68
- Practising options 438 6
- Self-employed or Ltd Company or seek employment 393 10
- Footballers Testimonials Taxable? 480 5
- Clients have been told I'm working from home 235 7
- FreeAgent question 258 7
- Software recommendations? 373 5
- can I approach clients ? 658 10
- Latest scam e-mails 131 1
- BrightPay 939 27
- Budget 2015 predictions 599 14
- Regular Director bonus 189 3
- Have the new quarterly employer returns been finalised and where do you get them? 198 1
- accounting in estate agents 91 1
- Network marketing client - how does it work? 361 7
- Corporation Tax Software 230 5
- AAT or ATT 400 6
- Retrospectively change VAT scheme? 280 5
- Accts software 301 3
- Possible Partnership? 667
- Tax and accounting treatment on long lease granted from freehold 528
- New Fangled Penalties 460
- Fuming! 440
- Purchase of property freehold - capitalisation of costs 327
- Charity dissolution and newly merged charity 266
- Outsource Data Entry 247
- Moving away from CCH software 244
- Lenovo – Superfish & Komodia – is your PC vulnerable 241
- Do I need a US Tax Identification Number to complete W-8BEN-E? 190