New payment scheme for family therapists forcing them onto PAYE
A fried has posed the following dilemma. I don't know the answer but thought that AccountingWeb readers may be able to help.
Both my children are taught at home as they are autistic. We are given funding by our local London borough and pay teachers/therapists to educate the children. The money is paid quarterly: I submit a signed statement from each of the therapists as to how much they received and I’m reimbursed for the lump sum up to an agreed amount (unfortunately insufficient – but that’s another story!). All the therapists are self-employed and fulfil that criteria as far as I’m aware (in that they don’t get paid holiday or sick leave; work for other families besides our own; hours per week vary from therapist to therapist and week to week but ranges from 9 hours to 16 hours; they provide their own work equipment; they have to pay for their own training). Although I’m not responsible for the therapists tax returns, none have had any problems about being accepted as self-employed by the IR.
We have just been informed that the way we receive our payments is going to be changed: the money will still come from the borough but in the form of a ‘personal budget’. We have been told that under this new payment scheme all therapists employed by ourselves must be employees, and therefore subject to PAYE. The My contact at the London borough say they have discussed the matter with HMRC and that was their conclusion: no argument! Everything else remains the same, we still have to find the therapists, negotiate pay etc.
Leaving aside the additional cost of this, I’m concerned from the therapist viewpoint that if their work for us is constituted as PAYE, then the IR can argue that if they work for anyone else on the same basis, that should also be PAYE.
My question is: do you think it’s worth trying to argue that because the circumstances of their work hasn’t altered one iota, they should still be entitled to remain self-employed (in other words where the money comes from is irrelevant – what is relevant is the terms of their service)? Or does the London Boriugh have us over a barrel as ultimately they are paying the money to us: and if they decide that anybody who works for us with their money is PAYE, then so be it?
- Recording Calls 9 1
- Closing my business down 274 18
- Your comments please 83 2
- CGT history of shares 34 1
- Accounting for reversed transaction 38 1
- Ordering same-day transactions 45 1
- As a soletrader taxi service, would purchasing low emissions taxi-cars qualify for AIA capital allowance? 139 1
- Scams are not always obvious 2,267 37
- Auto Enrolment - Director Only Answer 1,488 21
- What do you all do in your spare time? 905 36
- Charity requirements to report ALL I&E in accounts 53 1
- VAT flat rate scheme 148 2
- Should a non trustee sign Scottish charity accounts? 174 1
- CIS Subcontractor Catch Twenty Two Position after 14 years 239 3
- So who has completed a 2015 tax return then? 625 13
- How do we get US withholding tax back? 244 4
- VAT on long lease in comercial property that has opted to Tax 199 6
- Director - earning less than £8500 and no taxable benefits - PllD? 155 1
- Can I record depreciation, prepayments and accrued expenses in cash accounting? 314 4
- Need some help on importing procedures and VAT 104 1
- Moving away from CCH software 958
- QROP pension input amounts 445
- write off loan or loan to equity swap or both 388
- HMRC BENCHMARK EXPENSES 363
- fraud 289
- EIS relief on transferring shares to spouse 264
- Sole trade business in UK, but the owner works from EU 233
- Construction CIS LLP Company 217
- EPS and CIS deductions 208
- Out of time or not? 190