New payment scheme for family therapists forcing them onto PAYE
A fried has posed the following dilemma. I don't know the answer but thought that AccountingWeb readers may be able to help.
Both my children are taught at home as they are autistic. We are given funding by our local London borough and pay teachers/therapists to educate the children. The money is paid quarterly: I submit a signed statement from each of the therapists as to how much they received and I’m reimbursed for the lump sum up to an agreed amount (unfortunately insufficient – but that’s another story!). All the therapists are self-employed and fulfil that criteria as far as I’m aware (in that they don’t get paid holiday or sick leave; work for other families besides our own; hours per week vary from therapist to therapist and week to week but ranges from 9 hours to 16 hours; they provide their own work equipment; they have to pay for their own training). Although I’m not responsible for the therapists tax returns, none have had any problems about being accepted as self-employed by the IR.
We have just been informed that the way we receive our payments is going to be changed: the money will still come from the borough but in the form of a ‘personal budget’. We have been told that under this new payment scheme all therapists employed by ourselves must be employees, and therefore subject to PAYE. The My contact at the London borough say they have discussed the matter with HMRC and that was their conclusion: no argument! Everything else remains the same, we still have to find the therapists, negotiate pay etc.
Leaving aside the additional cost of this, I’m concerned from the therapist viewpoint that if their work for us is constituted as PAYE, then the IR can argue that if they work for anyone else on the same basis, that should also be PAYE.
My question is: do you think it’s worth trying to argue that because the circumstances of their work hasn’t altered one iota, they should still be entitled to remain self-employed (in other words where the money comes from is irrelevant – what is relevant is the terms of their service)? Or does the London Boriugh have us over a barrel as ultimately they are paying the money to us: and if they decide that anybody who works for us with their money is PAYE, then so be it?
- How to complete annual VAT return online? 53 2
- Private Residence Election for CGT purposes 34 2
- Standard 'email' template system 367 7
- VAT relief eligibilty for charity buying minibus 141 1
- I had a baby! Small practice recruitment - where would you look? 571 7
- Travel expenses 438 16
- Any Scottish members out there? 4,475 142
- Reclaim vat on invoice 175 3
- What's your best practice shortcut or 'hack'? 1,115 29
- Shadow director or alternative? 265 3
- Computerised Accountancy Software 282 1
- FRS VAT bad debt relief? 496 13
- Bankruptcy 431 10
- P11d Van - no private use 442 12
- Expanding To UK From USA 152 2
- How do I account for trees?! 294 1
- Foreign Dividends - tax repayment claim 504 17
- German VAT charged by US Supplier 241 5
- Abbreviated Accounts 354 4
- Accountancy fee tax return 586 6
- Raiders of the Lost Tax File 990
- Employment related securities question 504
- Looking for a qualified accountant 329
- Chartered Accountant in County Down N.Ireland 309
- IPP (International Pension Plan) income 277
- National Insurance 214
- valuation of intangible asset FRS10 and FRS20 205
- Joint construction arrangement CIS and VAT 195
- Cass 5 FCA Client Money Software recomendation 191
- Payments on account coded out?? 152