Is this pedantic and is there any point?
Taken on a client recently from another firm. It's only a small concern in any case.
However, the previous adviser appears to have claimed AIA on items introduced (per their schedule provided) on 06/04/2005... the majority of which are labelled "building works" (for a garage used to store Stock I believe).
Obviously this isn't correct. The client says the works and assets noted were indeed bought some time ago.
No tax is at stake as a loss was made (and not relieved). Just seems a bit silly and gives me discomfort over the other figures/affairs.
Should I bother making an issue of it?
- Capital loss on cessation for a sole trader 41 1
- Small hotel - food for personal use 174 3
- Why does Aweb always take the nuclear option … 2,626 59
- Xero Pain Points 223 12
- Models, agency rules and intermediary reporting 83 1
- HMRC site down ? 78 3
- Samsung Galaxy - Tablet War 59 1
- The importance of Grammar 829 22
- Tax Filer - Transfering figures from partnership to personal returns 111 5
- Late RTI submissions on change of accountants 127 2
- VAT - How hard is it? 340 15
- Tax Return for arrivals into the UK 138 4
- New starter - tax code 122 3
- Copies of every transaction can't be OK!! 569 9
- ACCOUNTING TREATMENT FOR DISBURSEMENTS 227 3
- Childcare 263 4
- Bookkeeping - Relevant Qualifications? 224 2
- Overdrawn directors loan account. 799 19
- New .accountant domain name extension 131 1
- VAT REGISTATIONS 207 4
- Any knowledge of salesorder.com 359
- Chart of account segments; Balance sheet vs P&L 296
- HMRC RTI Filing Problem 281
- Goodwill and the Summer 2015 Budget 279
- Could and would anyone here carry out a hot file review of some non statutory audit work please? 269
- Electric Car 220
- S222 Charge 200
- What is the best acounting software for online international retail business? 193
- Foreign Tax on Pensions 189
- Company Structure 170