Is this pedantic and is there any point?
Taken on a client recently from another firm. It's only a small concern in any case.
However, the previous adviser appears to have claimed AIA on items introduced (per their schedule provided) on 06/04/2005... the majority of which are labelled "building works" (for a garage used to store Stock I believe).
Obviously this isn't correct. The client says the works and assets noted were indeed bought some time ago.
No tax is at stake as a loss was made (and not relieved). Just seems a bit silly and gives me discomfort over the other figures/affairs.
Should I bother making an issue of it?
- VAT registration threshold 578 21
- Anyone else seen incorrect tax code notices - rather worring! 656 16
- Does unpaid share capital attract s455 liability? 253 5
- Do you design it or pick what's out there? 134 1
- First RTI P45 119 1
- Company Takeover Accounting policies 30 1
- EC VAT registration - place of supply 78 2
- How best to own a 4-way property partnership 116 1
- recovery of S455 on informal winding 153 2
- Gross sales to purchases 145 1
- I know ... 1,251 4
- What password safe app does anyone recommend? 695 18
- Tax on principal private residence 234 4
- extra 5p per mile for passengers 236 3
- What are the typical deductible expenses? 263 2
- Personal pension contributions 262 4
- Claiming tax relief on goodwill 331 4
- RTI Filing 955 20
- Staff entertaining or not? 272 3
- Sole Trader Start Up- Employment Help 404 5
- Residential Property Purchase Above £750K 703
- Using Sage with Sofa Categories 471
- One man Company and closing payroll scheme as none paid 309
- Does anyone have an unwanted ICAEW wooden plaque? 281
- Goods shipped inter EU and VAT Reporting 247
- growth voucher supplier 225
- Sage 200 and Access Dimensions reviews 189
- VAT on Gaming Machines 171
- transferring simply accounting 2010 from xp to windows 7 159
- Papilio UK Equity Release Mortgages Ltd 156