Is this pedantic and is there any point?
Taken on a client recently from another firm. It's only a small concern in any case.
However, the previous adviser appears to have claimed AIA on items introduced (per their schedule provided) on 06/04/2005... the majority of which are labelled "building works" (for a garage used to store Stock I believe).
Obviously this isn't correct. The client says the works and assets noted were indeed bought some time ago.
No tax is at stake as a loss was made (and not relieved). Just seems a bit silly and gives me discomfort over the other figures/affairs.
Should I bother making an issue of it?
- Mortgage Reference 102 2
- Is Xero payroll as rubbish as I suspect it is? 1,843 40
- Entrepreneurs relief after enhancement 127 3
- VAT - Check on clients business 1,166 45
- Practical experience 839 15
- Buy Samsung Galaxy Note 5 416 9
- Personal Tax 132 1
- VAT 304 1
- Gift aid procedure please? 179 4
- What counts as income for the £100k 'salary' cap for free childcare from 2017? 131 1
- last minute request 236 3
- US tax form 1099 (misc?) 77 1
- Cash gift from India 490 13
- GP ACCOUNTS 74 1
- Write an article on latest tax changes for landlords. 426 16
- Stamp Duty based on Exchange or Completion Date 102 2
- Re-Training costs - tax reief 250 6
- Maternity and claining expenses 656 6
- Overseas workday relief 168 5
- HMRC now overriding SA bank repayment details on tax returns 329 3