Is this pedantic and is there any point?
Taken on a client recently from another firm. It's only a small concern in any case.
However, the previous adviser appears to have claimed AIA on items introduced (per their schedule provided) on 06/04/2005... the majority of which are labelled "building works" (for a garage used to store Stock I believe).
Obviously this isn't correct. The client says the works and assets noted were indeed bought some time ago.
No tax is at stake as a loss was made (and not relieved). Just seems a bit silly and gives me discomfort over the other figures/affairs.
Should I bother making an issue of it?
- Any Scottish members out there? 9,113 340
- Treatment of goodwill in Consolidation 112 5
- Mortgage deposit Gift 409 18
- Profitable company wanting to buy an office 119 3
- property rental income split 238 3
- Shadow director or alternative? 457 4
- Does my client qualify for CGT Loss? 86 1
- EIS/SEIS capital gains exemption 76 2
- About to buy a block of fees. Any advice? 1,249 5
- Outsourcing iXBRL Tagging 391 21
- Use of home for storage 307 6
- VAT registration for self employed dentist??? 314 10
- where has the honest passion to help gone..??? 775 15
- Shutting down a company with creditors 1,226 21
- Shutting down losing Directors Loan 340 4
- VAT on stock sold at a loss 203 6
- Commercial property rental on disincorporation 80 1
- Payments on account coded out?? 291 1
- Late filing penalty for personal tax return. Reasonable excuse 360 9
- What should I do for 'free' 623 6
- Raiders of the Lost Tax File 1,182
- Chartered Accountant in County Down N.Ireland 400
- IPP (International Pension Plan) income 312
- National Insurance 306
- valuation of intangible asset FRS10 and FRS20 259
- Cass 5 FCA Client Money Software recomendation 232
- Unnecessary S9A Enquiries 232
- Non Resident 216
- Franchise income and costs 199
- Hands on experience of Digita 139