Solicitors work in progress
Under new rules that came into effect on 30 April 2010 the majority of personal injury claims (specifically Road Traffic Accidents) are now treated under the Fixed Cost scheme. How have people valued work in progress for a Law Firm under this basis and in compliance with UITF40? I imagine there must be a lot of 31.3.2011 year-ends where this has now had to be valued. Historically many accountants have relied upon the unknown outcome and valued WIP as £nil, however under the new scheme I cannot see how this can continue.
If a Law Firm has say 1,000 cases. The following situations will arise:
- A % of these cases will fail at any early stage due to bad claims/negligence etc and therefore WIP will be £nil (?)
- A % of these cases will fall outside the scheme, e.g. where liability is not admitted by the defendant insurer. WIP can therefore be valued as £nil if the outcome cannot reasonably be valued or known until settlement of the matter. A nominal value under FRS5 could be attributed based upon wage cost for example.
- A % of cases will be prior to Stage 1 completion (the defendant insurer is considering the claim) and therefore £nil WIP as liability is unknown?
- A % of cases will be prior to Stage 2 completion (the defendant insurer has admitted liability and the claim is being valued by the claimant)
- A % of cases will be prior to Stage 3 completion (the claim has been valued but there is some negotiation as to final quantum)
- A % of cases will have completed Stage 3, the judge has determined the claim, either by paper or oral hearing
Throughout this process, interim payments may have been paid to the claimant solicitor (e.g. £400 for Stage 1, £800 for Stage 2) which would reduce WIP by the corresponding amount.
On the expense side.........the firm has paid a referal fee in advance to obtain the case, lets say £750. Normally this would be prepaid over the length of the case, historically say 7 months so that WIP is matched with the expense. The treatment of prepaid referral fees would have to match the treatment of WIP as detailed above!
From any accounting perspective this seems incredibly complicated.
Any suggestions or thoughts would be appreciated !
- valuation of vehicles 217 13
- Is there no lower level to the work a lawyer would take on. 583 19
- Money Laundering Manual 185 4
- directors loan 93 4
- RTI Mess 474 9
- Tax on LLP members drawings not covered by future profits 340 13
- Mortgage Interest - Tax Deductible 331 3
- Scientist switch to accountancy - work experience? 976 27
- CIS not deducted 240 4
- Business only use of company car 532 20
- Penalties for late PAYE scheme 118 1
- Paying PAYE by Direct Debit 485 17
- Worst corporate entertaining events? 1,071 8
- Sage Accounts in a mess 464 9
- New Company reviews please 374 9
- Buy to let investors and the budget changes. 435 6
- Tax efficient vehicle 608 11
- CGT on Let Property 200 3
- How best to split income on a Buy To Let - married. How do you decide beneficial ownership 387 6
- Dormant company late with their CH submission 461 13
- RTI Rollback to delete incorrect data 269
- Motor Traders Assistant Bookkeeping Programme queries 234
- Vouchedfor.co.uk 229
- Tracesmart/Lexis Nexis AML software? Any opinions? 207
- Any thoughts on Capium? 185
- Expenses Software 184
- VAT FRS percentage for sales person? 173
- cgt quoted shares losses 172
- Sage Compatible P60's Self Seal 168
- auto enrolment 167