What a darling

What a darling

Didn't find your answer?

If I understand the PBR correctly our wonderful Chancellor is proposing the complete abolition of taper relief and indexation allowance. Most commentators have referred to an 80% increase for basic rate taxpayers. I can see that a rate rise from 10% to 18% is 80% but surely the increase in tax payable is really far more than 80%.

Consider a taxpayer with no other income (for simplification purposes).
Date asset acquired 1 April 1999
Date of disposal 31 March 2007
Amount of gain before annual exemption and taper relief £50,000
Annual exemption £8,800
Business use 100%
Taper relief available 75%

50,000 x 25% = 12,700 - 8,800 = 3,700

CGT payable £525.00

(2,150 x 10%) + (1,550 x 20%)

If the Chancellors proposals had been in force for 2006/2007 surely the CGT payable would have been £7,416.00. (50,000 - 8,800) x 18% = £7,416.00

Am I being incredibly stupid or have I missed something but that looks far more like 1,312% than 80% to me.
J Smith

Replies (2)

Please login or register to join the discussion.

avatar
By DonQuixote
04th Dec 2007 16:20

This amounts to a new tax on small business / savings
and lots of people agree with you; so much so that the Chancellor is going to back down.

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/SaveCGTrelief/

Thanks (0)
avatar
By AnonymousUser
05th Dec 2007 09:34

Exempt amount
I don't understand where you get £525 from but part of the explanation for the effect is that the annual exempt amount currently gives relief in terms of tax at either 20% or 40% which obviously makes it more valuable than if the relief is at 18%.

Thanks (0)