Wholly and exclusively question re land.
I asked my client if the land utilised by his business was used W & E for his business.
His reply was that on quite a large portion of the land he allows farmers to graze their sheep free of charge. He also added that this was necessary otherwise the land would become unusable for his business purposes and that this was a very cost effective solution (being free).
Can my client still claim that the land being grazed is used W & E for his business?
It seems unfair to me for it not to be the case as he would loose the chance to reclaim mortgage interest on that portion of land and also suffer when he eventually sells it in the distant future
Comments gratefully received.
- What is the best blog for practitioners to follow? 342 6
- Tech Champion of the Year 256 6
- Xmas party 120 1
- Just because it's Friday 293 6
- Playstation 4 - Allowable expense or not? 3,361 66
- Inheritance Tax - Simple Question 151 4
- Non-resident employer & employee 108 4
- Capital Allowances 157 4
- equipment rental 220 10
- Acquisition by company 115 5
- Non sequitur 543 7
- Client using boyfriend's personal account 1,500 23
- R&D on products not sold 100 3
- Distance between Postcodes in Excel 920 13
- Under Cash Accounting rules how do I account for a credit note issued outside the Corp Tax period? 197 4
- Quirky thread of the year: Community Awards 646 9
- Transfer of land to family members 98 2
- The complete uselessness of the British banking system 592 11
- The process of issuing dividend? 218 6
- Not registered for VAT. Germany wants proof! 242 5
- Desperately seeking Susan, Sam or anyone with any other name 1,366
- Darwinpay Partnership Assessment 437
- Alphabet shares 241
- Agent fees to sell business 231
- ACCA continuity of practice arrangement needed 230
- Charge out rates in London 184
- How to reclaim VAT for a non-EC UK visitor 169
- which entity 151
- UK tax regime 'attractive' to investors, says KPMG 142
- confusion about 141