Accountant faces disqualification over £2.2m fiasco

Northern Ireland’s Department of Enterprise, Trade and Investment (DETI) has started disqualification proceedings against a chartered accountant at the centre of the failed £2.2m Bioscience and Technology Institute (BTI) project.

Accountant Teresa Townsley had been appointed to the board of the BTI, along with three others, but ended up with her own private company earning £127,000 in fees from the government-backed initiative.

The company went insolvent in 2005 after a series of payments, which auditors found irregular, including £100,000 paid to Mrs Townsley as a 'finder’s fee' for finding a building which proved so unsuitable it was never even fitted out.

The Northern Ireland Audit Office has since produced a new report that shows there were concerns surrounding her conduct along with no evidence that she had told the rest of the board about this payment.

Continued...

» Register now

The full article is available to registered AccountingWEB members only. To read the rest of this article you’ll need to login or register.

Registration is FREE and allows you to view all content, ask questions, comment and much more.

Comments

Yet another crooked accountant.    2 thanks

Roland St Clere... | | Permalink

How much has it cost to produce this report?

Ms Townsley should be made to reimburse the tax payer for the cost of uncovering her dishonesty.

 

CLICO - CIB Affairs in Trinidad & Tobago - Commission of Inquiry

WinstonNarine | | Permalink

Much is being revealed about qualified ACCA personnel in the mismanagement of financial matters and failure to act in a professional manner and involved in corrupt transactions.

How can we as ordinary citizens take actions to have ACCA Local Chapter investigate and revoke the ACCA Practicing License of those Accountant involved.

Thanks.

Winston Narine

weaversmiths's picture

Gravy Trains

weaversmiths | | Permalink

Looks like yet another scam with public money being misappropriated.  It makes me wonder if the correct people handle all this public grant money supplied for schemes like this, are they really up to it?  We had a similar occurrence with our local Council a few years ago where  a relative of a relative of a relative (we all know the picture) was provided with hundreds of thousands for a similar study on a proposed  totally unsuitable building on a seafront car park which, after hundreds of years,  suddenly appeared to belong to the Council and not the fishermen.   She closed/liquidated the company to ensure that there was no possibility of the money being returned and the land has now been given for free to a Art Gallery which very few of the inhabitants of the town want. Whatever happened to the "arm's length transaction" term?

TheAncientOne

I love her indignation

chatman | | Permalink

I love her indignation; she obviously feels terribly victimised. I would love to be like that; no guilt; life would be great.

why ?

The Black Knight | | Permalink

are there no criminal proceedings ?

 

substantial transactions with directors ?

The Black Knight | | Permalink

Surely if there was no approval then the transaction is Ultra Vires and the amount repayable ?

billgilcom's picture

proceeds of crime -POC

billgilcom | | Permalink

POC action should get all the ill gotten gains back if court action ensues from the public outcry... Ok you can always dream

Public outcry

The Black Knight | | Permalink

I think you are right.....Nothing happens unless there is a public outcry !