Accountant to repay Ponzi scheme victims

A former accountant who helped John Hirst swindle investors out of millions of pounds has been ordered to pay back more than £90,000 in compensation.

In August last year Hirst was jailed for nine years after funding a lavish lifestyle in Majorca through his £10m ‘Ponzi’ investment scheme.

His accounting accomplice, Richard Pollett, was also jailed for six-and-a-half years after he was found guilty of conspiracy to defraud.

According to the Huddersfield Examiner, Pollett was recently brought back to Bradford Crown Court from prison so that a judge could make a confiscation order against him under the Proceeds of Crime Act (POCA).

Judge Jonathan Durham Hall QC, agreed to...

Continued...

» Register now

The full article is available to registered AccountingWEB members only. To read the rest of this article you’ll need to login or register.

Registration is FREE and allows you to view all content, ask questions, comment and much more.

Comments
JAADAMS's picture

Largest Ponzi scheme of all...    3 thanks

JAADAMS | | Permalink

I've always been told that the state pension is the biggest Ponzi scheme is all!!

Andy Reeves's picture

The state pension may be a    1 thanks

Andy Reeves | | Permalink

The state pension may be a Ponzi scheme, but I don't see anyone offering an alternative.

JAADAMS has a private scheme then

Roland St Clere... | | Permalink

I wonder who has paid the contributions?

PENSION

ver1tate | | Permalink

If you simply put all the monies you and your employers had contributed to this worthless rip off, you would have a far bigger income. Even allowing for contributions to a private medical scheme, at the reduced rates offered by many accounting bodies, you would still have an ample income.

 

However, I would suggest that further investigations are carried out to determine how he managed to go through some £9 million. There must be other assets. Tenacity is the backbone of true justice.

Fraud

peter stanley | | Permalink

Can anyone please tell me why an obviously intelligent person sets out on such a venture when they could have a perfectly satisfactory life style by using normal legal methods for running a business ?

Greed

neiltonks | | Permalink

peter stanley wrote:

Can anyone please tell me why an obviously intelligent person sets out on such a venture when they could have a perfectly satisfactory life style by using normal legal methods for running a business ?

Greed. Pure and simple. Enough is never enough.