Auto enrolment: Educate to accumulate

The government has made a number of announcements this year, most recently on the need to ‘cap’ pension scheme charges and introduce greater transparency in the sector, says Michael Whitfield, chief executive at Thomsons Online Benefits.

Both measures intended to improve pension outcomes for members. Noble as these may appear, they focus on one aspect (finance) and fail to solve, or even address, the crux of the issue – actually getting employees to take responsibility for their income in later life, commonly referred to as employee engagement. Having a disengaged majority, comfortable with auto enrolment, and ‘vanilla’ pension schemes is simply not a viable option for the Great British apathetic pension investor. If sustained, this apathy will produce a nation of ineffective savers, poorly provided for in their later years.

Numerous surveys are already revealing...

Continued...

» Register now

The full article is available to registered AccountingWEB members only. To read the rest of this article you’ll need to login or register.

Registration is FREE and allows you to view all content, ask questions, comment and much more.

Comments
gerrysims's picture

Pensions Regulator online

gerrysims | | Permalink

I tried to add the auto-enrolment service to my agent's online account. They couldn't do it because I am based in France with a French postcode despite the fact I advise a number of UK employers. They were not interested in providing a solution so have effectively placed an obstacle between me and my clients. A poor state of affairs and very amateurish.

Battle weary?

moneymanager | | Permalink

Unlike the British army it would appear that the Roman version is going from strength to strength. The only question is when will they retire; when they are centenarians or somewhat earlier?

In passing, those long serving centurions must be made aware that where they have sought protection from an LTA charge and stopped contributions that auto-enrollment most certainly does affect them and will do so every three years. I think it disgraceful that there is no 'repair' mechanism in place for anyone who fails to continue to opt out of this government strong arming tactic.

 

For those who have found it difficult ot save while on active duty and are now small or late savers hoping to take the lot i.e. sub £18k as cash under the Trivial Commutation rules could also find themselves auto'd in and locked into taking just the standard 25% as cash and a piddly pension with the rest.

Stand Easy

moneymanager | | Permalink

I have just spotted an announcement of two days ago of great benefit to those withearlier protection and affected by auto-enrolment: see http://www.ft.com '

'Pension concession for higher earners'

National Insurance    1 thanks

chatman | | Permalink

Why doesn't the government deduct money from people's income and invest it for their pensions? That way, no profits would leak out to the corrupt private sector. They could call it "National Insurance" and "State Pension".

Singapore    1 thanks

Wiganer Elaine | | Permalink

I'm not sure if this is still the case, but I remember reading this a few years ago and thinking that the Singaporean method was a good idea and could be adapted in the UK.

Basically, every person had their own "government account" . A set percentage of their annual income was paid into this account as a minimum contribution; you could draw down from this account for a set number of things, one of which was an income after retirement. The best part of this was that whatever monies were left in an individual's "account" when they died were passed onto family members as part of their own "account".

Each year everyone received a statement detailing the value to date of their account!

If this can be done in Singapore, surely something of this nature could be done here in the UK?

The costs of auto-enrolment for small business employers will end up driving many of them to the wall. It shouldn't be yet another tax that businesses have to pay to employ someone!

PK Group's picture

Quote: "There’s no escaping

PK Group | | Permalink

Quote: "There’s no escaping the fact that the 30,000 companies with staging dates in the four months after April 2014 add a serious sense of urgency to overcoming the complexities and capacity issues that clearly exist within the sector."

This highlights the need to get everything sorted very early. We say to start thinking about your Automatic Enrolment responsibilities as far as 6 months before your staging date, just so you don't get caught out.

Also, it will certainly be interesting to see the value of the 'average' pension for opt-ins and opt-outs of the scheme.

PK Group