Carrier jet accounting errors cost £74m

Plans to change the fighter planes on new aircraft carriers wasted up to £74m through “basic accounting errors”, MPs have claimed in a new report.

MPs on the Public Accounts Committee said estimates were rushed through and based on wrong costings, not taking into account increases in inflation or VAT.

Margaret Hodge, chairman of the PAC, said: “The MoD has admitted that the 2010 decision was based on deeply flawed information. Officials also made incredibly basic errors such as forgetting to include the costs of VAT and inflation.

“This about turn, which will cost the taxpayer at least £74 million, is the latest in a saga that has seen billions of pounds of taxpayers’ money down the drain.”

The cost of converting the carriers for new aircraft is expected to be up to...

Continued...

» Register now

The full article is available to registered AccountingWEB members only. To read the rest of this article you’ll need to login or register.

Registration is FREE and allows you to view all content, ask questions, comment and much more.

Comments

VAT    2 thanks

jonnybennett | | Permalink

am i missing something here?  how can VAT be a cost to the govt?  the mod will pay it but surely it will then be paid over to hmrc.

it's no wonder we are in a pickle

The Black Knight | | Permalink

jonnybennett wrote:

am i missing something here?  how can VAT be a cost to the govt?  the mod will pay it but surely it will then be paid over to hmrc.

it's no wonder we're in a pickle

and other taxes they believe the government workers and secondary employees contribute.

it works thus (numbers for illustrative purposes only)

Salary 12,000 tax recovered 5,000 to pay for salary borrow 7,000 (less some recovery from real business, shrinking)

repeat

Outsource, and supplement with crime figures to massage figures for more lending and secure on an over inflated property market.

Why should government be any different from Enron and the banks.

Accounting Errors in MOD Purchasing

David Trangnar | | Permalink

ONCE AGAIN !!! 

And once again we pick up the bill. Will these people ever learn, or are they institutionally and systemically wasteful? Certainly sloppy with other peoples' (our) money. 

I dont recall (does anyone) ANYONE in authority carrying the can for these recurring failings. 

Isnt it about time? maybe it might sharpen up their concentration a bit.

Absolutely inexcusable (and I'm an Accountant).

David 

 

Another govenrnent management decision

pauljohnston | | Permalink

Yesterday is was £34million from DWP and today a mere £74 from MOD.

Duncan-Smith said yesterday that the "Civil Service" management was not up to the job so he had to bring in some one from ourside (ie a real businessman).  It does beg the question is management in the Civil Service up to scratch.

VAT Treatment

berniec | | Permalink

"The cost of converting the carriers for new aircraft is expected to be up to £2bn, rather than £500m to £800m, in part because officials thought that VAT would not apply"

Do we know on what grounds the "officials" thought VAT would not apply but the VATman says it does?

Tom 7000's picture

meanwhile overheard at the treasury

Tom 7000 | | Permalink

PSSSSST...George

 

what?

 

can you zero rate weapons for vat purposes

 

why?

 

we have blown the budget on the aircraft carrier and the media will have a field day and this will fix it....

 

Who is the secretary of state for defence?

 

Phillip Hammond....

 

He was ghastly to me at Oxford and he got a 1st in PPE and I only got a 2.1 in History and he had me drummed out of the Bullingdon club.....let the little  $£&#er    rot.

 

So now you know....

 

tis interesting

The Black Knight | | Permalink

Is it commercial either? Perhaps it needs a payment for the protection of oil reserves, or a sale and lease back with the cayman Islands LOL

Or they could take it to a tribunal like the car parking fees debacle and waste some more money throwing buns between government departments.

Don't fall in either category so its Std rate applies?

How did they rate the supply of the carrier in the first place? as this is only the modification.

 

never fear.

tomriv801 | | Permalink

do not worry, the vat will be a useful contribution to the cost of replacing the natural underground aquifers hs2 will be devastating. it will be a useful supplement towards the cost of the water being piped from Siberia. putin is playing this card close to his chest, that is assured. he is determined to increase his exports substantially.it seems very odd after the fiasco of not budgeting for vat in building the facilities for the Olympics the same mistake has occurred.if I have a doubt re vat, I just make a short call to the vat office!

plummy1's picture

Maybe

plummy1 | | Permalink

Maybe the HMRC had already taken into account future receipt of the Vat whilst the MOD did not take account of the payment of it. This would lead to a hole in the Governments overall budget.

a clever lot these Russians -

tomriv801 | | Permalink

a clever lot these Russians - all they will to do is turn the tap off and............. 

Oldmanwetmix's picture

The VAT office!!    3 thanks

Oldmanwetmix | | Permalink

It was probably the VAT helpline that told them VAT wouldn't apply in the first place, then denied any responsibility when some-one at HMRC read Tolleys and decided VAT did apply after all.

Thanks Oldmanwetmix    1 thanks

pauljohnston | | Permalink

For making me laugh on a depressing afternoon

Government Purchasing Messes

David Trangnar | | Permalink

All very well this - amusing etc, but where does it get us? 

Does anyone in Gov't give a ****? (apart from being caught doing it)

Govt will be gone in two years, few of them get to stay long enough to face the consequences of their failures, and Civil Servants ("not up to the job"?) get their pension anyway. 

And isnt it strange how these failures are NEVER in our favour? Statistically 50% of them should be.