Cash retrieval: Confiscation orders under fire | AccountingWEB

Cash retrieval: Confiscation orders under fire

An NAO report which reported that criminals keep all but 26 pence in every £100 generated by crime, has raised questions over the effectiveness of confiscation orders. 

Enforcement agencies collected £133m of proceeds from crime in 2012-13, while the estimated loss to the economy through fraud last year was £52bn, according to the report.

The NAO said that the criminal justice system lacks a coherent strategy for dealing with the proceeds of crime through confiscation orders and that it is hampered by poor IT systems and poor communication.

Earlier this month, the Public Accounts Committee described the performance of law enforcement bodies as “rubbish”.

But according to David Winch...


» Register now

The full article is available to registered AccountingWEB members only. To read the rest of this article you’ll need to login or register.

Registration is FREE and allows you to view all content, ask questions, comment and much more.


Simple solution

Justin Bryant | | Permalink

Why not just make all such criminal activity a deemed DoTAS activity?

That way, these criminals will be on an equal footing with law abiding citizens doing absolutely nothing illegal and being fully compliant and HMRC can simply issue them 90 day payment notices come July 2014 on a fully retrospective basis.




I thought it was 100%

chatman | | Permalink

I have heard that, in most cases, they have been allowed to keep 100% of their bonuses, not just 26%.

They keep 99.74% of their tax efficient bonus

Justin Bryant | | Permalink

They pay 26p in every £100 = 0.26%.

It wasn't the arithmetic that was the problem

chatman | | Permalink

Justin Bryant wrote:
They pay 26p in every £100 = 0.26%.

Not on their bonuses they don't (although I thank you for the advanced mathematics lesson).