FRC drops Lehman case against Ernst & Young

The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) has abandoned the case against Ernst & Young over its role as auditor of collapsed US investment bank Lehman Brothers.

Despite various lawsuits and regulatory probesGareth Rees QC, FRC’s executive counsel, decided that “no action should be taken against E&Y or any individuals in connection with their conduct in the case.”

A spokesman for E&Y responded to the decision, saying it “confirms our belief that the quality of our audit work met with the appropriate professional standards”

The long-running case centred on the discovery by administrators PwC of a shortfall in the pool of money held on trust for clients, which should have been segregated and safeguarded in accordance with the rules set out in CASS.

Continued...

» Register now

The full article is available to registered AccountingWEB members only. To read the rest of this article you’ll need to login or register.

Registration is FREE and allows you to view all content, ask questions, comment and much more.

Comments
nogammonsinanundoubledgame's picture

There is I think a not subtle distinction between ...

nogammonsinanun... | | Permalink

... "a decision not to proceed" (as described in the body of the narrative) on the one hand and on the other "the respondent being cleared" (as the header suggests).

With kind regards

Clint Westwood

[EDIT] subject header has since been edited rendering this post otiose.

But equally

The Black Knight | | Permalink

But... equally if there is no case to answer then it should not leave a stain on good character.....Wanting to pursue and being able to find anything to pursue are also important?

Can You? / accountancy web show accounts?

The Black Knight | | Permalink

Can You? / accountancy web show accounts?

So we can all have a butchers?

have not checked yet

The Black Knight | | Permalink

have not checked yet but may be available on charity commissioners website for free?

.....will have a read!

There are

The Black Knight | | Permalink

There are some shocking reports filed at companies house, some of which are just the filing of evidence of criminal offences under the companies acts and or the taxes acts.

There are many fictitious directors and company secretaries or at least using pen names...which is quite amazing in this day and age.

You are quite right Companies house and HMRC do not care..as they have always had sufficient willing contributors of tax to satisfy their wasteful requirements.

Maybe someone will soon take the deficit seriously and wake up to the gold mine available by looking at the accounts. Although I think it is because they do not understand the accounts combined with general apathy which leads to the problem.

Either that or there is corruption within....perhaps there is another news of the world type story to come out. After all if you can make payments to police officers then why not HMRC?

 

 

 

Off topic

dsefton | | Permalink

I have just received my copy    1 thanks

Supertorben | | Permalink

I have just received my copy of Economia, issue 13, in which I note that Nick Land proudly states that he is a non-executive of the FRC. He also chairs the Audit and Assurance Council, the successor to the APB. Of course, he needs no introduction, having been executive chairman of Ernst & Young for 11 years.

FRC drops Lehman case against Ernst & Young

dsefton | | Permalink

The subject line above is the topic to be covered here. Who the hell cares about your case?

Now, that's more like it.

dsefton | | Permalink