Replies (5)
Please login or register to join the discussion.
@ robertlovell: "... a charge of allegedly ...", surely not?
Hi robertlovell! Surely the actual charge(s) laid before the court(s) do not include the word "allegedly", do they? Reason: the summons should indicate the actual charge(s) that should be based on evidence that has been duly considered by CPS.
QUESTION: Is AWEB [or its helpful readers] able to provide full details of the actual wording(s) of these charge(s), or to indicate an appropriate link, please?
Thanks & I note: ... that nothing should be reported ...
Thanks & I note:
... "Rohan Anthony Pershad has now been summonsed on a criminal offence and has the right to a fair trial. It is extremely important that nothing should be reported which could prejudice this trial."
i am sure there is
a very good reason why he failed to declare vat of £600,000...(its small change afterall) - can't wait to hear the explanation....i wonder if it will follow recent the enquiries where it appears high profile 'professionals' have forgotten, didn't realise or thought someone else was doing it......
Strange that, wouldn’t you say?
I find it amusing that Harry Redknapp is cleared of all tax avoidance when it is found that he has substantial funds in a bank account in his dog’s name, yet an ethnic minority origin QC is convicted despite thinking that his chambers paid the VAT (at 17.5%) due out of the circa. 22% it took from his fees.
Strange that, wouldn’t you say?