PwC fined £1.4m for JP Morgan breaches

Big Four firm PricewaterhouseCoopers was hit this week with a £1.4m fine and a minimum of £22,051 in costs for disciplinary failings it admitted in its role as auditor for JP Morgan Securities (JPMSL) from 2002-08.

As previously reported, PwC accepted that it had not applied due skill, care and diligence in its work on Financial Services Authority compliance reports and failed to follow the FSA’s  Client Asset Rules (CASS).

The misconduct admitted by PwC included:

  • Reporting to the FSA that JPMSL had complied with the client asset rules for the financial years from 2002 to 2008 and maintained adequate systems to do so
  • Failing to obtain sufficient appropriate evidence on which to base these opinions, particularly the investment bank’s failure to keep client money separate from its own funds at all times. Following the subsidiary’s creation through a merger between Morgan Guaranty Trust Bank and Chase Manhattan in November 2001 money client funds held in the Futures and Options unit’s accounts were “swept” each night by the company’s unified treasury system into an unsegregated account called “Prime Nostro”

An agreed statement of facts on the case is available as a 2.9MB PDF from the AADB website.

Continued...

» Register now

The full article is available to registered AccountingWEB members only. To read the rest of this article you’ll need to login or register.

Registration is FREE and allows you to view all content, ask questions, comment and much more.

Comments
Steve McQueen's picture

Proportionality

Steve McQueen | | Permalink

PWC's t/o for the year to June 2011 was £2,461m.

Whilst £1.4m is a lot of money, it represents just 0.057% of PWC's income.

This is not even a slap on the wrist, its a fly dancing across their ear at three o'clock in the morning following a night on the vino!

 

 

dbowleracca's picture

And that is just Uk turnover

dbowleracca | | Permalink

Group turnover worldwide is around $26bn so its a drop in the ocean

Auditors are as complicit as bankers

Roland St Clere... | | Permalink

Both are equally reponsible for the financial melt down and the cost of clearing it up.

The auditors should have acted as the guardians of probity and honesty. Instead they have trousered hundreds of millions of pounds in audit and other fees and in return have signed off on one of the greatest heists in history.

I would say "Shame on them all" but then they have no shame because they have no conscience.

Drop in the ocean

Chambers Accounting | | Permalink

A regulatory slap on the wrist. Just wait and see how much the investors sue them for in a class action.

in a perverse way

The Black Knight | | Permalink

that's what you want for an auditor.....

So it's probably good for marketing ?

Auditors that see things might be good at their job but....are not really wanted by the audit firm or the client.

Wonder who the fall guys are on that job...as I think that's next on the practice procedures list.

We know who it won't be

Roland St Clere... | | Permalink

The partners will blame their staff...