What added value means

Many accountants talk about providing “added value” to their clients. Mark Lee unravels the confusion over what this phrase means.

What do clients want?

I’ve heard it said that clients want ‘added value’. I disagree. They want value for money. Sometimes accountants are able to show how reasonable their fees are by flagging all the “extras” they provide at no additional cost. As long as the client appreciates the value of such extras, this can help the sale.

Adding Value is a state of mind

In a recent Any Answers thread on business consultancy and added value I suggested that providing added value services was partly a state of mind as well as “going beyond the norm”.

This attitude might include things such as putting yourself out to benefit the client, effecting introductions to prospective customers and helping them with something that is otherwise unrelated to your recurring services. Anything in fact that adds value in the client’s mind over and above what they used to get from your predecessor and distinct from the services they have contracted you to provide.

My sales training friend, Marcus Cauchi, puts the key point more succinctly: “Added value is only added value if the prospect acknowledges a real (or perceived) need for the particular aspect of the product/service.”

Focusing on “value” is key - Any reference to added value probably helps reinforce the idea that you are providing quality services that have value. This is quite distinct from the more common attitude of focusing on low priced commodity services. Anyone can undercut your fees. 

You may do it without realising it - It has long been the case that some value adds are simply a case of rethinking and repackaging elements of your service that might otherwise be ignored. What do you do as standard that other accountants do not include as part and parcel of their service?

The additional services issue - By definition added value services are not, in my view, additional services for which you charge a fee.

The Any Answers question on business consultancy hinged on additional services available from the accountant. On reflection I think this is confusing two distinct issues. Could the existence of an Added Value Network of accountants (AVN) who provide additional consultancy and benchmarking services have contributed to this confusion?

I have written previously on AccountingWEB about how some accountants focus on the provision of business-focused advice – and others merely claim that they will do so by describing themselves as “accountants and business advisers”:

What examples can you share of how you provide added value to clients?

Mark Lee is Consultant Practice Editor of AccountingWeb and writes the BookMarkLee blog to help accountants build more successful practices more enjoyably. He is also Chairman of the Tax Advice Network of independent tax specialists. 

Continued...

» Register now

The full article is available to registered AccountingWEB members only. To read the rest of this article you’ll need to login or register.

Registration is FREE and allows you to view all content, ask questions, comment and much more.

Comments

Pages

jaybee661's picture

@HUGH W DUNLOP    1 thanks

jaybee661 | | Permalink

HUGH W DUNLOP wrote:

Nothing ridiculous about that! Accountancy is a 'service' industry. I believe several dictionaries give a good idea of the FULL meaning of SERVICE; And it certainly does not include serving other when YOU feel like it.

 

... judging by your previous comments regarding incorporation you need to take your own advice, methinks!

ShirleyM's picture

That's your choice, but not mine.

ShirleyM | | Permalink

"Accountants are there to serve the clients, not vice versa."

I would say we provide a service, but we are not servants of our clients, and I never ever intend to be one. If you want to be at the beck and call of your clients (and non-clients) all hours of the day or night, then that is your choice, but it isn't mine.

How can you blame his previous accountant when you admit the client ignored the HMRC correspondence that warned him of the problem? Did he even inform his accountant of the problem? It seems you have already found the previous accountant guilty, but he may have been banging his head against a brick wall with this particular client and given up in frustration. So .... as you have quoted in another post ... 'judge not lest you be judged'!

johnjenkins's picture

@ Mark

johnjenkins | | Permalink

Your talking about the difference between number crunchers and Accountants. There are many franchises that say "you can be an Accountant in 24 hours just give us £10K and we'll set you up". That is not what being an Accountant is all about. I know we have had this arguement before about what an Accountant is and it certainly isn't answering the phone at 1 am, especially after celebrating with a client that he has got his companies CIS refund after 3 years. Some Accountants might feel that their experience in certain fields have to be paid for, some will reflect that in their annual fees, but it isn't added value.

Pages