Wrongful Trading v Insolvent Trading - which is the unlawful act that you need to watch out for?
The short answer is Wrongful Trading is the unlawful act as set out in Section 214 of the Insolvency Act 1986. Insolvent Trading or trading whilst insolvent would be part of the evidence of an act of Wrongful Trading, however it is not necessarily an unlawful act. It depends upon the facts of the case.
So what is the difference between the two?
There is no statutory recognition afforded to Insolvent Trading. Whilst undesirable in many instances it is not necessarily unlawful.
Wrongful Trading is an action that can only be undertaken by a person occupying the position of Director of a limited company. That position of “Director” can be determined in a number of ways, being official (recognised at Companies House and in a company’s statutory register), de facto or shadow as set out in the Companies Act.
Wrongful trading is the act by Directors of a period of trading in which debts and liabilities are incurred and typically increase, whilst having no reasonable prospect of a company avoiding insolvent liquidation. It is the action by Directors of accepting credit when it is highly unlikely that the same would be discharged due to the financial position of a company.
Wrongful Trading only applies to company Directors, whereas Insolvent Trading can be undertaken by individuals such as sole traders.
There are two tests for solvency defined in Section 123 of the Insolvency Act 1986, being 1) are your assets exceeded by your liabilities and 2) are you failing to discharge your debts as and when they fall due. If you satisfy either criteria then you are technically insolvent in accordance with the definition of the same in the legislation.
What is the risk? Well if you are accused by a liquidator of a company of Wrongful Trading then as Director you could be personally liable for the damage the company suffered during a period of Wrongful Trading - so do not do it!!
If in any doubt take professional advice at the earliest possible opportunity. Often such advice can be obtained without charge for an initial consultation with a Licensed Insolvency Practitioner.
As with most things, the law
Always seek insolvency advice from a reputable IP in your country/state.
As with most things, the law varies in different countries. Some have "ring-fenced" payments made for fraudulent trading so that they are made available to the pool of assets for unsecured creditors.














Fraudulent trading
Then again there is the criminal offence of "fraudulent trading" contrary to s993 Companies Act 2006. This occurs where a person (probably, but not necessarily, a director) is "knowingly party" to the business of a company being carried on "with intent to defraud creditors" or "for any fraudulent purpose".
Fraudulent trading necessarily involves dishonesty.
The maximum penalty for fraudulent trading is 10 years imprisonment.
David