Save content
Have you found this content useful? Use the button above to save it to your profile.
AIA

Expert guide: Valuing a company

by
25th Jan 2006
Save content
Have you found this content useful? Use the button above to save it to your profile.

By Adrian Ward, director, AMS Business Sales

The question of how to value a business is one which pops up frequently on Accountingweb. In truth, a business is only worth what someone will pay for it. The price paid on the day of sale is the only time that a company value is not a matter of opinion or conjecture.

It is useful to meet two or three experienced accountants, professional advisors and brokers to guide you on the value of the company. It is at this point a decision must be made on whether to use an intermediary to sell the company or to go it alone.

Methods of valuation
There are a number of methods of valuing a company. The following are most common:

1. Multiples of adjusted sustainable profit
This method uses the technique of applying an appropriate multiple to the sustainable (adjusted net profit) of a company, thereby arriving at a sale value. The multiple selected is applied to pre-tax or post tax.

Adjusted net profit
This is the company's reported historic or projected profits, adjusted for abnormal or non-recurring items, although expect any potential buyer to challenge the adjustments.

Non-recurring costs are those that would not be present when the owner or director has left the company, these are known as add backs.

Add backs can be:
# Directors' costs such as PAYE, salary, cars, pension and health cover (but not dividends).
# Fees paid to additional directors or individuals who will not be involved in the company in the future. Other non recurring costs can be added back, such as an exceptional bad debt or one-off costs that will not be repeated.
# If the removal of the owner would result in a replacement being required, the cost of the replacement needs to be re-introduced.

Calculating the multiple
Having established the adjusted net profit, it has to be decided what the appropriate multiple for the companies sector is.

The multiples for SME non-listed companies and businesses usually range from one to 10.

Owner run businesses are normally valued at between one and 2.5 times adjusted net profit.

Managed companies or businesses with profits up to £500,000 will attract a factor of between 2 to 7.

Companies with profits over £500,000 usually attract factors of three to 10.

There are a number of questions that will affect the chosen multiple

# Company Sector. Does the company operate in a sector that is in demand?
Are there many active buyers to push the multiple up?
Without demand in a sector it does not matter how profitable a company is, there will be a low factor applied.

# Niche sector. If the company operates in a niche sector it can add to the desirability, but if the sector itself is not in demand it is not relevant.

# Accounts.
The purchaser will want to see the last three years accounts. A high turnover, low profit company has little value compared to a medium turnover, high profit company. Most purchasers are looking for companies with increasing turnover and profit.

# Management Accounts.
After the historical accounts, good management accounts have a great impact on the valuation of a company. This includes not only the turnover and profit levels, but the quality of the actual information supplied, its consistency and the management systems that are in place to control the company.

# Turnover.
Although turnover does not determine the value, it does affect the type of purchaser. The larger the turnover, the more likely it is that the purchaser will be another company, rather than an individual. Corporate finance assisted purchasers generally look for companies with turnovers in excess of £10,000,000 and profits of plus £500,000.

# Profit.
Profit is the single most important factor in determining the value of a company, the greater the profit, the higher the base for the multiple. High profits allow for greater borrowing by the purchaser, thus a higher purchase price.

# Balance sheet/net asset value.
Does the balance sheet have items that are likely to confuse a purchaser?
Are the aged debtors within the industry norm?
Is the stock correctly valued?
Is there any dead stock?

# The owner's involvement.
Owner run companies where there is no middle or upper management attract a far smaller multiple than those that have a strong multi-layered management structure and are not owner dependent for their survival.

# Staff.
Is there one staff member that is key to the company's survival?
Are all the staff paid enough to keep them motivated?
When did they last receive a pay rise?
Are there any unusual bonus schemes?
Is there a key sales person?
Are all the key staff on contract?
Are there any pension schemes that are an issue?
Will the staff want to leave if the company is sold?

# Contracts
Is the company reliant on a key contract or contracts?
Are they transferable?
Are these all signed?
Are they long term?
Or are they in need of renewal?

# Suppliers
Is the companies supply chain secure?
Are there any supply contracts?
Are there any risks to the supply?

# Location
Location can affect the desirability for individual purchasers. If a company operates in an area that a company wishes to move into, this obviously increases the desirability.

# Property leases
Leases can cause far more aggravation and delay in a sale than any one single item.
Having all the property leases clearly detailed and secure will help the sale and assist a positive valuation.

Positive, clear answers on each of these questions could increase the multiple. However, each company requires individual analysis to determine the multiple and thus its market value.

2. Price/earnings (p/e) ratio
The P/E ratio is used in the valuation of larger listed companies. The P/E ratio is the ratio of the market value of the equity. This can be worked out pre or post tax. A high P/E indicates that investors are expecting higher earnings growth in the future compared to companies with a lower P/E. However, it is necessary to compare the P/E ratios of one company to other companies in the same industry, or to the market in general, or against a company's own historical P/E to establish to true relevance of the companies' P/E. It would not be useful for investors using the P/E ratio as a basis for their investment to compare the P/E of a software company (high P/E) to a manufacturing company (low P/E), as each industry sector has different growth prospects.

3. Earnings Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortisation (EBITDA)
EBITDA stands for earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. It is calculated by taking operating profit and adding back to it interest, depreciation and amortization expenses. EBITDA is used to analyze a company's operating profitability before these expenses are applied.

In conclusion
Whichever approach is used, determining an appropriate multiple for a private company is always going to involve a significant degree of opinion and subjectivity as only quoted companies have valuations which are readily accessible and which have been established by the market.

It is important if you decide to use an intermediary that they understand the SME sales market, as this helps give a more accurate valuation.

Tags:

Replies (8)

Please login or register to join the discussion.

avatar
By lawrencematthewj
29th Jan 2006 10:34

Angelas Specialist Recycling Start Up
Angela,

I'd agree with lauventure that your team neees to be consulting specialist SME finance providers. For private equity the key is to get an adequate proposition in front of many. If they are interested in the sector/segment investors or their reps wil be prepared to dig deeper. An additional thought is have the team fully explored Govt funding given the term "specialist recycling" there must be strong possibilities of early stage support.

Please feel free to contact [email protected] if you would like to discuss.

Thanks (0)
avatar
By AnonymousUser
25th Jan 2006 15:23

Valuing technology start-ups
Interesting point of view. Assume the article was written based on personal experience. It becomes even more challenging when valuing a technology start-up, at pre-revenue stage.

We are trying to raise funding, and our valuation is based on discounted future cashflows for the next three years with discounted horizon value, thereafter. We have chosen opportunity cost of 20% but this can easily be increased to 40%. This valuation is further reduced by a percentage to arrive at the offer price, which in opinion, is considered as market value. These figures gives a ROI over 1000%, and subjective.

We have not got to the next stage of negotiations, which no doubt will be painful.

Recent thoughts are to let small amounts of shares, say for minimum investment of £2.5k. Then we have a better chance of preserving our valuation, but it becomes harder to raise the original amount we want. In the meantime, our valuation increases, as we get closer to revenue generating stage.

So if you want a small portion of a high growth company, please do contact undersigned in the first instance

Best regards
Manoj Ranaweera
[email protected]

Thanks (0)
avatar
By lynnecart
25th Jan 2006 15:28

But isn't this only part of the story?
I was lucky enough to spend some time, some years ago, working within the Business Valuations department of a Big 5. The way I was taught to approach a "normal" business valuation (i.e. not involving intellectual property/options etc. etc.) included, but was certainly not limited to, the multiple methods described above.

I think an article pitched at this level should mention that it is wise to apply several different methodologies and compare the results - generally speaking, if said results are consistent, you might be more comfortable that your valuation stands up. If they are wildly disparate you need to look more closely.

For example, you might use the multiples approach above and come to a conclusion on a range of value... but what if this is not supported by the NPV of future cash flows? What if the book value of net assets exceeds the multiples conclusion?

NB. Multiples can also, with a great deal of care and experience, be applied to P&L results other than the bottom line.

Thanks (0)
avatar
By angehodgson
26th Jan 2006 13:52

Start-up problem not confined to tech companies
The valuation of a start-up is difficult for many start-ups, not just technology businesses. It is relatively easy to value businesses which are similar in scope and structure to those that already exist, but for very novel business ideas it is very difficult to either find a model to benchmark against or to confidently identify an appropriate multiplier: an especially difficult task when the first years of the business are spent building up your customer/client base and your operational capacity.

I'm currently working with a group attempting to set up a specialist recycling facility. The management team have the technical skills to pull it off, but like many start-ups, lack the funds needed to make the substantial capital investments they will need to operate not only within the regulatory regime but within their own business and ethical codes. Apart from trying to get them to focus more on what they conservatively expect to achieve after several years, in order to support their requests for initial funding, does anyone have any constructive suggestions to assist?

Thanks (0)
avatar
By roncoates
25th Jan 2006 14:42

What about the value of accountancy practices?
Does anyone have first hand experience of what accountacy pracises are selling for in pracitse and/or negotiating a value with the reveune when the "sale " is to a connected party.?
Does the range say .9 to 1.5 of gross reaccuring fees still stand up ?

Thanks (0)
avatar
By gus.orchard
26th Jan 2006 16:43

Angela's start-up problem
Angela, this is an area where you will need an expert fund-raiser with experience of the market and the characters in it. If you drop me an e-mail ([email protected]), I can put you in touch with someone who has successfully raised money for ventures such as the one you're describing.

Thanks (0)
avatar
By [email protected]
29th Jun 2015 10:31

Valuing a security systems business

It looks like there are some well informed and smart people in this forum and hope someone can help me. I am doing an academic work in valuing an SME (not quite a start up as its been running successfully for 4 years now). The business is security systems installation (for home and commercial premises; something like ADT but much smaller) I need to value this business as a going concern. Can anyone please tell me what could I use as a discount rate for the PV approach (using disc FCF model)?

If there are any other approaches, please feel free to share as I am fairly new and it being an unquoted company, its getting a bit difficult to get "industry figures"

 

Pal

Thanks (0)
avatar
By Clinton Lee
26th Mar 2016 23:34

I've long had a problem with these "valuation methods". FMV may be useful for theoretical, HMRC or court purposes, but it's not what businesses get when they are sold. These methods all arrive at "a figure" but businesses are hardly ever sold for one cash figure; it's usually a "package deal".

The deal structure can include some cash, some shares in the merged entity, some deferred or performance related payment, some seller financing, various warranties and indemnities issued by the vendor  ....

There are many variables.

Investors are looking for a particular rate of return for a given level of risk. Reduce the risk (by taking some on yourself) and the price goes up because you're in a different risk bracket. Expect more cash in early stages and the total price goes down to maintain the RoI rate. Price isn't written in stone. Business aren't worth simply what "buyers are willing to pay". A business is worth the best package that you can negotiate with buyers.

Sadly, business owners rarely appreciate this as evidenced by the fact that most start off their valuation journey by getting a "free valuation" from a business broker, a party with a vested interest in providing flattering valuations.

For anyone who's not convinced and believes they can stick one figure on a privately held company going to market, get in touch and I'll pay double that figure to buy you out.

Thanks (0)