Bank of England forecasts zero growth + ITEM Club comments
The Bank of England is expected to forecast zero growth in its quarterly inflation report as the double-dip recession deepens and the eurozone crisis continues.
Sir Mervyn King is expected to indicate no growth for 2012, compared with 0.8% predicted three months ago and 2% a year ago.
The Guardian says George Osborne will now come under pressure as a result to soften austerity measures and move to boost growth in the economy.
Last month the IMF said the government should ease its fiscal consolidation, which includes spending cuts and tax reforms, if the recovery continued to stall.
The Ernst & Young ITEM also commented on the new figures:
“The downward revisions to both growth and inflation were broadly in line with expectations and largely reflect recent events rather than a change of view. Monthly economic indicators, in particular business surveys have been relatively soft over the past couple of months and the official data has continued to disappoint.
“For once the Bank had been too cautious in May about the pace at which inflation would fall. Most of the temporary factors that had kept inflation elevated over the past couple of years have now unwound, but spare capacity in the economy is likely to continue to exert downward pressure on price. The Bank's forecast for inflation slightly undershooting the 2% target in the medium-term seems sensible.
“Over the past couple of months, the Bank has taken a number of initiatives to loosen monetary policy, such as raising the level of asset purchases, introducing the Funding for Lending Scheme and activating the Extended Term Repo Facility. MPC members are now in ‘wait-and-see mode’ to judge how they feed into economy and there was no indication of any further monetary stimulus in the near future. Assuming that the Governor’s comments were representative of the majority on the Committee, they also appeared to head off any chance of a rate cut.
“According to the Bank's central forecast, inflation is already expected to remain slightly below the 2% target for a prolonged period. This could worsen further if downside risks to the outlook were to materialise, particularly from the Eurozone. Were such a scenario to play out, it would force the Bank to provide further monetary support.”
What goes around ....
BOE inflation policy just about to bite rail commuters in the bum
Inflating away debt has just come home to commuters with proposed fare increases based on 'inflation' + x%
So, if the pundits are to believed, the lucky old commuter is just about to cop a 20% fare rise in the next 3 years
and who profits from this rise ?? the Government - which means that not only are commuters having their asset eroded (QE etc), they are also being asked to fund an BOE induced 'artificial inflation' based rail fare rise
Good effort by the Government/BOE - this sort of sleight of hand would make magicians proud
.... comes around?
-
Comments: 0
-
Comments: 0
-
Comments: 0
-
Comments: 0
-
Comments: 0
-
Comments: 0
-
Comments: 2
-
Comments: 0
-
Comments: 0
-
Comments: 1


Real BOE agenda ... 1 thanks
Why does the BOE want to keep inflation to 2%, surely they have a secret agenda to pitch it as high as possible before the press picks it up; say between 4-5% would be a much better approach to inflating away the debt whilst maintaining artificially low interest rates (killing savers & benefitting the profligate) & printing worthless money (QE - more to come ??)
... and with the BOE looking for a new 'Tefflon-King' what particular qualifications does one have to have for indecision, sitting on one hands and getting it toally wrong in 2007/08. After all Mr King was 'on-watch' when all these antics were going on and did nothing about them - so how come he is still in office. On the other hand perhaps he is in line for a 'survival' bonus for such an amazing performance of keeping his job
Yes, in part some of the woes are down to Europe but that is what happens if you hand out money and raise peoples standard of living without having a corresponding increase in production (efficiency) to justify the rise - sooner or later the whole pack of cards collapses because there is no increase in output to balance the hike in standard of living. But that is a political decision rather than an sensible/economic one, and politics is where the problem originated