Mobile income is income which is capable of being shifted around international groups so that it is taxed in the country with the lowest corporation tax rate. Income which is “mobile” may include income earned from passive sources such as intellectual property, design and patents, but it could relate to a wide number of sources, and it could be quite time consuming to prove that the source was not located in the UK for other reasons than tax avoidance. Mobile income might also relate to shared services, or other intra-group activities.
Conversely “active” income will not be subject to special rules as this is taxed where generated and the treasury hopes to be able to successfully separate the two out. UK multinationals are not so sure that this is possible or whether they like the treasuries ideas after all.
Further consultation is expected on the taxation of foreign profits in July, until then it is reported that UK multinationals have been lobbying ministers for a change in the proposals. It has taken business some time to wake up to what might be on the agenda, although everyone is hampered by the lack of detail. With more and more large companies threatening to leave the UK Chancellor Darling appears to have woken up to the fact that this could be another "income shifting" protest on a much bigger and more damaging scale. He is already digging some trenches, it seems - he recently took the radical step of announcing the formation of a business-government forum to look at tax issues for the multinationals.
Number of comments: 1
AccountingWEB.co.uk 6-May-2008
Categories: Tax News, Tax - Nicki Ross Martin
Times read: 1985
Or perhaps we should add further sweeteners - for example:
Paying companies much higher tax credits in cash for employment, training etc?
Exemption from business rates?
Free public transport for workers?
Free heath care for workers? (oh sorry, we've got that already)
Free food for workers?
Free Sky TV for workers?
Anything else they might like - perhaps exemption from UK income tax of the esteeemed members of their board of directors (who are heartily most welcome in, or to remain in, the UK)?
Tragic thing is I expect that in the unlikely event the inept cretins in charge of finance at New Labour read this, these sorts of things could become serious policy options.