I don't know about anyone else, but how is this the government helping, its not the government who pays the minimum wage its businesses! Small businesses can no more afford to pay more to staff than the employees can to pay more tax. The main winner in this situation is the treasury!
Please discuss how would this affect you and does anyone have any ideas on how to fix this terrible situation.
Allan Pearson
www.payepeople.co.uk
Allan Pearson
Number of comments: 11
AccountingWEB.co.uk 6-May-2008
Categories: Tax Features
Times read: 3035
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7397705.stm
If the government can afford £50 billion to bail out Northern Rock, and then umpteen more billions to bail out other banks, and can also afford to keep an unsustainable proportion of our armed forces in Iraq and Afghanistan - then it can certainly afford not to impose this tax increase on the poor.
If, nevertheless, it remains unable to balance it books, here are a few more suggestions... (1) a small extra windfall tax on oil companies who are raking in the profits with current oil prices: their production costs have not increased substantially; (2) a few pence on the 40% tax band - or a 50% tax band for those on £100K upwards; (3) do a u-turn also on the main corporation tax rate and put it back to 30% (at the same time, why not also ease the plight of small companies by putting theirs back to 19%?).
"Our long-term objective is a lower starting rate of income tax of ten pence in the pound. Reducing the high marginal rates at the bottom end of the earning scale - often 70 or 80 per cent - is not only fair but desirable to encourage employment."
Under the heading "A new politics" the same manifesto also said:
"The Conservatives' broken promises taint all politics. That is why we have made it our guiding rule not to promise what we cannot deliver; and to deliver what we promise."
Hmmm...
Since amount of tax is now doubled due to doubling of rate, doesn't that mean if the NMW is increased to benefit the worker, HMRC will get a proportionately larger amount of tax take as well ?!
Restore the progressive 10% rate !!
This is what they did for the pensioners after all - they got a massive increase in PAs this year.
Surely it's better for people not to have to pay the tax in the first place rather than pay it and then get it back through tax credits.
But no, this government likes handouts.
I know it is harsh, but administratively a U-turn is a no brainer. It is so much simpler then bending the benefits system back to the position as if the 10p band had never been cut.
A raise in the NMW will also increase employers NI as well as employees NI, so there is more to it than there seems at first.
Finally, I would sack the team of treasury advisors who failed to point out the fundamental basics when budget 2007 was being drafted.
To support please go to:
http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/tenpamended/
The petition reads:
We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to reconsider
penalising businesses to compensate those losing out due to the
withdrawal of the 10p tax band
Businesses have been hit too many times and 2008 will not be
easy. Why should the Government consider increasing the
minimum wage to single childless youngsters purely to increase
their pay packet without the Government picking up the tab.
It is time for business owners to make a stand similar to
labour back benchers to make the Prime Minister realise that
we will not be pushed around.
We are paying an increasing share of the tax burden - increases
in corporation tax from 19% to 22% so that large businesses can
pay less (30% to 28%) and like so many "tax saving" initiatives
of the past it is our administration costs that increases to
deliver these extra payments.