Gordon Gilchrist argues that accountants are wrong to shy away from providing financial advice when clients are crying out for it.
Since 2008 the world of financial services has been pulled through the mire; it’s been one horror story of mis-selling after another. It’s understandable that accountants look to that profession and decide that they don’t want to have anything to do with it.
But what if they had picked up the gauntlet 20 years ago? The excesses we have witnessed probably would never have happened. Accountants aren’t tarnished by the taint of commission. They get paid by hour and don’t differentiate between the value of tax planning advice that saves £10,000 or £1m - clients still get the same bill.
The word of financial services is different - they get a percentage of the value increase. It’s a different mindset.
The holistic view
The link with tax planning and exit route planning is so strong that one could argue that financial services should be a natural domain of the accounting profession. The accountant is blessed with a very holistic view: they have all the relevant information from company accounts, tax returns and client interviews. Their input into overall wealth management and asset protection is so much more important than any other professional adviser. An IFA has to ask for all the documentation that the accountant already has - which is why the accountant should have been providing that advice in the first place.
Tax advisers are already engaged in short term financial to protect clients from higher tax rates - they’re the only player in town who can do that.
But there’s a longer term role that’s covered by phrases such as wealth management or asset protection - helping to protect clients against future liabilities or financial pitfalls.
Gordon Gilchrist is marketing director of The 2020 Group. A regular lecturer, he is also the co-author of the Croner.CCH book, 'SME Consulting'.