Save content
Have you found this content useful? Use the button above to save it to your profile.
AIA

Court upholds Ford's UK tax relief appeal

by
29th Nov 2012
Save content
Have you found this content useful? Use the button above to save it to your profile.

Companies outside the EU will find it easier to claim tax relief on UK subsidiaries following a recent Court of Appeal ruling.

The court ruled that US car maker Ford is entitled to group tax relief on its UK subsidiaries FCE Bank and Ford Motor Company Limited.

Before 2000, a group relationship for UK tax purposes could not be traced through non-UK resident companies.

HMRC therefore refused a claim for group relief by FCE from its sister company Ford Motor Company Limited, because both were directly owned UK resident subsidiaries of Ford Motor Company.

FCE maintained that it was entitled to that claim, relying on the US-UK double tax treaty.

They claimed that this represented discrimination against the two UK companies because of their ownership by a US resident.

Such discrimination is prohibited by the double taxation agreement between the UK and US. Both the first-tier tribunal and the upper tribunal accepted this argument.

However, the Court of Appeal held that whether or not the US parent was within the charge to UK corporation tax was irrelevant to the claim for group relief, which was a claim that only affected the UK tax position of the two UK subsidiaries.

The only reason for the refusal of the group relief claim was FMC’s US residence, said law firm Slaughter and May, which represented Ford Motor Company in the case. 

Commenting on the case, Michael Anderson, head of direct tax litigation at KPMG said: “Although this decision will not affect many companies directly, it will be encouraging news for companies which are seeking to rely on a double taxation agreement between the UK and a non-EU country to support a group relief claim where losses have been made by an EU fellow-subsidiary of a non-EU parent.”

Tags:

Replies (2)

Please login or register to join the discussion.

avatar
By Ian Bee
30th Nov 2012 09:03

Corporation Tax memories

Those of us who have been around for a few years will remember this as being something of a hazard to international groups until 2000. The way round it was to insert a UK subholding company. This was not always easy to do, depending on how the UK subs had been acquired in the first place.

It would be interesting to know why Ford did not manage to do this, and perhaps the details of the case will tell us.

Also interesting to know how many protective claims might have been made by companies in a similar position. This largely predated self assessment so there would have been a two year time limit to make the claim (from memory).

 

Thanks (0)
avatar
By hiu612
03rd Dec 2012 14:11

Immoral Global Companies...

Imagine Ford looking to use UK group losses against UK group profits. . . good to see that the moral boot doesn't fit the other (HMRC) foot.

Thanks (0)