The Carmen Electra debate: An HR expert's view

I'm fascinated that an HR consultant feels that he can contribute anything useful to this debate without actually looking at the picture refered to - which whilst sultry, was at least as fully clothed as any of the women competitors in the recent World Championships, and was certainly not pornographic.

In the course of the debate someone said something to the effect that if anyone objected to anything, then the correct HR response was to ask for it to be taken down.

That's what the iconclasts did; in the end they managed to completely outlaw all depictions first of humans, then of animals, then of plants, and then virtually all pictorial representation; which is why there was such an amazing artistic development of script in the iconoclast muslim world - it was the only avenue left for human artistic development.

Have we really reached the position where the rational tolerant majority have to allow themselves to be dictated to by minority religious and sexual fundamentalists of all descriptions?

What a sad age in which to live (or should one more accurately say exist).

Since when has underwear been "fully clothed"? Would you greet clients in wet underwear? No? Then why is it acceptable on the wall?