EU uncovers resistance to IFRS for SMEs

Preparers and users of accounts across Europe are ambivalent about the introduction of the new IFRS for SMEs, a European Commission survey has found.
Respondents from the UK joined those in the Netherlands, Spain, Denmark and Ireland among the 13-strong majority that favoured adoption of the new SME standard, while the nine dissenting countries included Germany, France and Italy and Belgium. A narrow majority (11 to 10) of public authorities and standard-setters across Europe felt that IFRS for SMEs was not suitable for widespread use across the continent.
Benefits of IFRS for SMEs
Those who supported the IFRS for SMEs highlighted the advantages for comparing financial statements prepared in different jurisdictions, which would encourage more cross-border trade and merger/acquisition activity and lower the cost of raising finance.
For companies that operated subsidiaries in different EU member states, the SME standard would make preparing consolidated accounts easier as there would be no need for reconciling national accounting treatments.
Audit costs would be lower too. And the development of a common educational framework for accountants around the standard could pave the way for more mobility of accountants and audit services within the EU.
Supporters added that because the IFRS for SMEs is easier to follow than full EU IFRS, companies could adopt it as a stepping stone towards public listing.
The drawbacks
Opponents to the application of IFRS for SMEs in Europe stressed the standard’s complexity, particularly for small companies. For companies operating in just one country that have no need for cross-border comparability, the extra burden the standard imposed would outweigh any potential benefits.
The IFRS for SMEs is not suitable for internal management, they argued, and would increase the cost of preparation and audit of individual company accounts and the increased disclosure requirements could potentially put companies that adopted it at a competitive disadvantage to firms using less stringent accounting rules.
To adopt the new rules, companies and their accountants would have to redesign internal processes, train staff on new accounting systems and produce restatements of comparative information. Many small companies lack accounting expertise would need to enlist professional help when adopting IFRS for SMEs. These initial adoption costs would recur whenever the standard was revised, the report noted.
Continued...
The full article is available to registered AccountingWEB members only. To read the rest of this article you’ll need to login or register.
Registration is FREE and allows you to view all content, ask questions, comment and much more.
Or if you are already registered, login here
IFRS for SMEs is too complex to meet user needs
The problem is that the IFRS for SMEs is in most areas just a cut down version of full IFRS. Full IFRS requires complex accounting treatments to fulfil its objectives of comparability and to assign a numerical amount to all assets and liabilities. These complexities have been carried through into the IFRS for SMEs. e.g. deferred tax, finance leases, financial instruments, pensions, share based payments.
Users of smaller company accounts do not require these complexities. They need to see accounts conveying absolute information about future cash flows rather than relative measures of performance. They do not need to see meaningless numbers in the balance sheet to inform them about the existence of hard to value assets or liabilities. They can read the notes to identify their existence and obtain information about their implications for future cash flows.
Irrelevant rubbish
Absolutely no advantage to any of my clients.
Just more cost of adapting to more stupid accounts rules.
Acceptable to me and my clients if turnovers below £5 million are exempt.




I can help drive this
There is a simple way of dealing with the naysayers. Create the chart of accounts templates with the required reports and start shipping them with the major accounting packages. If they have genuine benefits (and I think they do) then The Users will drive it themsleves.
I find France and Germany very difficult to deal with currently. A uniform standard accross Europe - Taken to the rest of the world will benefit everyone. TurboCASH is the only accounting software package that has one compile shipped to over 80 different tax regimes. The install script is as big a job as the code base itself.
If anyone is interested in working on this with me, I have 100 000 TurboCASH users in 80 countries, in 25 Languages who can all be introduced to the idea. We can code it, what we require is contributors with the IFRS expertese. We can drive it from there.
Let the committees carry on talking, in the meantime we can lead this initiative.
-- "No one possesses the less because everyone possesses the whole of it. He who receives an idea from me receives it without lessening me, as he who lights his candle at mine receives light without darkening me" - Thomas Jefferson