Big Four evidence to Lords inquiry

The Big Four's UK senior partners emerged with only a few minor bruises from their encounter this afternoon with the House of Lords Economic Affairs Committee.

Their lordships summoned the partners to Westminster to give evidence in their inquiry into concentration in the audit market. What followed was less of a parliamentary grilling than 1hr 40mins of gentle questioning in what looked like a heavily negotiated engagement. The most forceful questions came from former Conservative chancellor Lord Lawson who wrung some "astonishing" responses from the four partners. For a quick overview, you can follow the live thread here, or read on for more details of the enquiry.


The interrogation is part of their Lordships’ ongoing inquiry into market concentration with the audit market. Facing the panel will be:

  • Scott Halliday, managing partner, Ernst and Young,
  • Ian Powell, chairman and senior partner, PwC.
  • John Connolly, senior partner and chief executive, Deloitte
  • John Griffith-Jones, chairman, KPMG.

According to a preview note circulated by the committee, the witnesses will be asked questions ranging from the Big Four’s dominance to the role bank auditors played in the financial crisis, and the amounts Big Four firms earn from audit and other tax and consultancy work.

The session took place at 3:35pm in Committee Room 1 of the House of Lords and is available for streaming via Parliament TV.

 

Comments
John Stokdyk's picture

No that wasn't Geoffrey Howe!

John Stokdyk | | Permalink

The visuals weren't brilliant, but I initially thought I was hearing not one, but two former chancellors on the Parliament soundtrack. In retrospect, I think that I may have mistaken Lord Tugendhat for Lord Howe.

Apologies to all concerned.

Disclosure seems to be discretionary ...

JC | | Permalink

At what point did the 'big 4' assume the mantle of deciding what to disclose and who gave them the 'legal' lattitude to hide relevant issues in this matter

'.. It was “absolutely astonishing”, he said, to learn that the Big Four were completely relaxed (and tight-lipped) about banking solvency issues because they were aware they’d be rescued and to have made their concerns public would have made the situation worse ..'

On the other hand they may have identified the issue earlier and mitigated some of the exposure to the taxpayer

So the solution is - determine when the 'big 4' first became aware of the issue and the bank's collective exposure at that point. Then ascertain the banks final exposure and send the 'big 4' the bill for any deterioration - simple and effective!