Save content
Have you found this content useful? Use the button above to save it to your profile.
AIA

Information Commissioner prosecutes North London accountant

by
28th Apr 2008
Save content
Have you found this content useful? Use the button above to save it to your profile.

North London-based accountant David Darko, of Darko Consulting, was fined £300 and ordered to pay costs of £539.20, plus a victims' surcharge of £15 by magistrates for breaking the terms of the Data Protection Act 2002.

The accountant's crime was failing to register with the Information Commissioner's Office as a "data controller". The DPA stipulates that company that “controls” personal information about individuals must register with the ICO, for a basic charge of £35. In Darko's case, he failed to do so in spite of repeated reminders, the ICO said.

According to ICO chief operating officer Simon Entwisle, Darko's case was part of an ongoing campaign to ensure all accountants that process personal information notify with the commissioner.

"Mr Darko was fined more than eight times the usual cost of notifying, as well as legal costs - this prosecution should serve as a reminder to all other accountants of their obligations under the Act," said Entwisle.

Earlier in April, Bolton-based accountant Azhar Saleem was ordered to pay £743.50 fines and costs for failing to register with the ICO. An Edgware solicitor was also prosecuted last week and fined a total of £704.20.

Sage whitepaper on managing data protection
Earlier this year, Sage published a white paper on information security, which covers all the relevant legislation and practical issues surrounding data protection. Free copies can be requested via this AccountingWEB.co.uk information page.

Tags:

Replies (1)

Please login or register to join the discussion.

avatar
By DavidW878
29th Apr 2008 12:14

Of course
Quite right and proper of course. It's obviously necessary that the most stringent controls should be maintained over personal data.

On a completely separate and entirely unrelated matter, does anyone happen to know if HMRC have found their disks yet? And what fine was imposed on HMRC for their cavalier approach to the security of personal data?

Thanks (0)