After the budget: The not so bad news! By Rebecca Benneyworth

Behind the shock of the Carter proposals for reduced filing deadlines for self assessment tax returns the Budget did include some material which might represent good news for accountants and their clients.

The upshot of KPMG's study into the extent of the administrative burden posed by the tax system on smaller businesses is a report from HMRC entitled 'Progress towards a new relationship'. This report, subtitled 'How HMRC is working to make life easier for businesses', provides interesting reading.

Continued...

» Register now

The full article is available to registered AccountingWEB members only. To read the rest of this article you’ll need to login or register.

Registration is FREE and allows you to view all content, ask questions, comment and much more.

Comments

Euan - what a good idea....

andyprentice | | Permalink

....those businesses that keep good records would then get some reward from reduced reporting.

Accounts still required though

cockburn.nildra... | | Permalink

All very laudable but presumably we still have to prepare accounts to complete the tax return in 80% of the usual time.

graydjames's picture

Tinkering round the edges

graydjames | | Permalink

I recently left the profession as I had become wholly disillusioned both because of the ridiculous burden of regulation placed on me as a sole practitioner and because of the burdens placed on my clients. It was not so much that the clients suffered these burdens, but more the burden that I felt in trying to keep them abreast of them. If they lapsed you may be sure that it was seen as my fault.
These proposed changes are frankly laughable. They will do very little to change things.
The problem with the system now is that succesive governments have made the burden of regulation so utterly outrageous that a few chnages like this are applauded as meaning signifcant improvement when in actual fact all they do is turn the clock back a couple of years or two. We were fighting for a reduction in burdens on business during the Major administration for goodness sake. Things have only got worse. This represents nothing more than tinkering around the edges.
What is needed is a radical, major reform which, whilst it continues to ensure that we are all tax payers, removes from us the burden of being assessors and collectors as well.

I agree with Graham

John Snowden | | Permalink

wholeheartedly. Shortening forms is of marginal benefit when the problem is the complexity and subjectivity of the tax system. A simple form cannot accommodate a complex tax system. Meanwhile, it is disturbing to know that tax professionals might be deliberately omitting information from P11Ds, whether or not tax is at stake...

Euan MacLennan's picture

Abolition of Form P11D

Euan MacLennan | | Permalink

It is hardly radical to omit non-taxable expenses from form P11D. It is probably what many employers and their advisers do already on the grounds that the compliance effort is out of all proportion to the uselessness of the information. What would be radical is to require employers to process all benefits in kind through the payroll; the value would be added to gross pay, subjected to both tax and Class 1 NIC and the same value deducted from net pay. The employee would suffer tax at the time he enjoys the benefit, not years later when the Revenue gets round to processing the P11D. Forms P46(Car) & P11D would be redundant along with Class 1A NIC and there would be no need for adjustments to PAYE codes.