Court rules VAT is due on salary sacrifice retail vouchers | AccountingWEB

Court rules VAT is due on salary sacrifice retail vouchers

The European Court of Justice has ruled that employers must account for output tax on salary sacrifice retail vouchers to employers.

Global pharmaceutical company, Astra Zeneca, has lost its case on the VAT treatment of retailer vouchers provided to employees as part of their remuneration package.


» Register now

The full article is available to registered AccountingWEB members only. To read the rest of this article you’ll need to login or register.

Registration is FREE and allows you to view all content, ask questions, comment and much more.


Does this have further ranging implications?

My New Name | | Permalink

It has long been established that the benefit declared on the P11D should include the VAT so the income tax man doesn't completely lose out. So if 40% taxpayer is given a benefit that costs (inc VAT) £60 then the taxman gets £24 tax not the £40 he would have had if the employee had been paid more, taxed and bought the item himself.

The VAT man however is worse off as the employer reclaims the VAT but the employee wouldn't be able to.

So is this salary sacrifice ruling actually applicable to all VATable benefits?

If a benefits package is pay plus health insurance then does VAT on the insurance "output" have to be paid over (or not reclaimed) too? What if the employer says "ok the salary is this plus you can choose from a range of benefits up to this cost"? Surely HMRC will be arguing that any package that has non-pay elements is salary sacrifice in another form, ie it may not be described as such but the effect is the same, the total cost of employment is split between pay and benefits.