David Cameron reveals all

The Tory leader has laid out when the second Budget will be next year and some of what it will contain if a new Conservative government comes to power.

David Cameron announced 2010’s second Budget of the year before Mr Darling has had chance to deliver the pre Budget report – let alone the 2010 Budget. He did add that the general election next year would be a hard fought battle, but he promised a Budget within 50 days of being elected if the Conservative party win the general election (which must be held before June).

Continued...

» Register now

The full article is available to registered AccountingWEB members only. To read the rest of this article you’ll need to login or register.

Registration is FREE and allows you to view all content, ask questions, comment and much more.

Comments

AIA

oldersimon | | Permalink

Oh Rebecca !

The AIA is one of the best pieces of simplification for small business in years, so let's hope we don't have to go back to calculating capital allowances for the 2.5 million smallest businesses.

And massive simplification ?  Every party in living memory has promised that, and working with the Admin Burdens Board has shown me just how difficult it is.

Tax savings if AIAs are abolished

Anonymous | | Permalink

I thought that AIAs only brought time differences to tax collection (deferment rather than saving).

Do I miss a point here or does the honourable lady suggest doing away with all form of capital allowances as well as raising the corporate tax rates on smaller profits to 25%? If so, this lethal combination is bound to get the UK economy forging back to work again!

RebeccaBenneyworth's picture

Of course

RebeccaBenneyworth | | Permalink

I agree that in theory capital allowances should be a cash flow benefit only but anyone who practised through the early 1980's will know that in effect the 100% allowances available at the time became a permanent deferment of tax rather than merely a timing difference based on continued investment. (Witness the games with deferred tax at the time)

In any event, the way that the Red Book is put together is based on annual cash flows, so that a one year delay is shown as a cost in that year. However, it would probably be true to say that abolishing AIA may well yield the sort of sums I have quoted year on year because of the continued investment described above. Not all businesses will invest every year but we might imagine one quarter of the economy investing every four years on average, for example.

I wouldn't like anyone to think that I think that this or indeed any other proposals put forward by parties is a good idea, my object was to observe what parties are saying and thus draw conclusions from it that might be useful to practitioners in giving advice to clients. Such as this year might be the right time to invest in equipment as AIA may not survive. I picked on AIA because it was really the only component of capital allowances that I could see that could in any way fit the cost. I agree with Simon - it was a brilliant simplification but may yet prove an expensive luxury.

I wouldn't be surprised ........

Anonymous | | Permalink

Increasing the small company tax rate to 25% is nicely targetted at (by definition) small businesses only. Abolishing AIA has a massively disproportional cost to small businesses. Big businesses on the other hand are the ones who would benefit from cutting the main corporation tax rate.

The overall impact therefore would be transferring the tax burden away from large corporations and onto the shoulders of small family-owned businesses.

Who has the most chance of creating jobs and rebuilding the economy? Small businesses. Who contributes most to the Tory coffers? Big businesses.

Furthermore, regardless of the particularly damaging impact on small businesses, if the reduction in the tax rate is to be paid for by abolishing capital allowances or AIA, the tax burden will be shifted onto the shoulders of businesses investing in expansion and capital purchases, and away from those not investing.

I realise the author isn't advocating these policies. She is merely pointing out the sort of ill thought through policies the Tories may well opt for.

Small Business Corp Tax

pauljohnston | | Permalink

It should be made clear that this is in respect of Limited Companies Only.  For the rest of there is a tax rate of 20% or 40% and now 50% plus NIC of 8% upto the upper threshold then 1% thereafter.

Perhaps therefore a Corp Tax Rate of 24% across the board would make it a more level playaing fiekd.

However perhaps a business profit tax would be much fairer to cover all business income upto say £250k.