NIC exemption for start-up businesses

Rebecca Benneyworth outlines how the new NIC exemption scheme will impact small businesses.

Continued...

» Register now

The full article is available to registered AccountingWEB members only. To read the rest of this article you’ll need to login or register.

Registration is FREE and allows you to view all content, ask questions, comment and much more.

Comments

Make it wider

Briar | | Permalink

If the objective of the measure is to create employment outside of London and the South East, then it should be an easy job to allow existing businesses (with less than 10 employees), as well as new start-ups, to take advantage of the relief. It should also be possible to devise anti-avoidance rules to prevent abuse of the relief (e.g. phoenix start-ups). After all, it is more likely that existing small businesses will seek to expand their operations (and hence the number of employees) than brand new start-ups (which by experience take longer to get going). If the major reason for the relief is to create employment why exclude existing businesses? Also, on a cynical note, is the relief merely targeted at those civil servants who might lose their jobs and create new businesses which will then take over the activities which they have previously carried out? That is, new companies will be formed to sell their services to government/local government. They will receive the NIC relief (worth £50,000 over 5 years). It is likely that public spending will go up as result!!! For example, there is an announcement in the Budget that HMRC will begin to employ debt collection agencies to collect unpaid tax. If I was a tax collector, I would leave HMRC (or get made redundant with the added benefits), set up a debt collection agency, and sell my services to HMRC. I would receive up to £50,000 in NIC relief and be doing the same job as I was doing before - a net negative effect on the economy. 

Wild Billy's picture

12 months or 36 months?

Wild Billy | | Permalink

I think the holiday only apllies to employees taken on during the first 12 months rather than the 36 months suggested in the article. Isn't the 36 months the period in which new businesses could be set up?

That would be more consistent with the manifesto commitment.

chrischapman5's picture

Wider issue

chrischapman5 | | Permalink

I agree, I dont see why this is a black and white geographic benefit that you only are entitled to if youre outside the South East.

Small businesses across the whole of the UK need support at times like this as its them that are going to see us out of the recession over the next year or two and become stronger. How many small businesses fall into the trap of being based in London or the South East and what is that as a proportion fo the total SME's in the UK? quite significant I'd think.

However, its good news for small businesses so we should applaud it. many of my clients www.mybusinessfd.com will certainly welcome it.

Chris

www.mybusinessFD.com

 

New Nic exemption and what counts as "new"

michaelpenn | | Permalink

 Are there any indications at all as to what will constitute a "new business"? Anything in the trial they did? Since they are obviously looking for these new businesses to start straight away one assume normal commercial criteria could apply, ie something the business was not already engaged in and definitely not a Phoenix.

The potential here is in fact very good and correctly structured the savings could be a lot more than just up to £5,000 per employee.

Michael S Penn

 

RebeccaBenneyworth's picture

12 or 36 months

RebeccaBenneyworth | | Permalink

Yes, I didn't make it clear in my article - and indeed this would seem to be a minor flaw in the scheme. From the document "Regional Employer NIC's Holiday for new businesses" I had at first understood that the holiday applied to the first three years of the business, and the first 12 months of each employment. This would make sense as it would allow businesses to expand over the three year period. On re-reading following your comment, it is clear from Question 9 that the holiday only applies to the first 12 months of the business, so unless you recruit all of your staff in the first year, the holiday will not relate to any expansion.

I guess this keeps the cost modest and will allow very small start up a holiday in respect of one or two staff - confining the benefit financially to the first year of business only seems to me to be a little short sighted, but of course money's tight and this is better than nothing.

Many startups start with self-employment, then grow

mikewhit | | Permalink

But I guess there is nothing here that would help a one-person-band ...