Save content
Have you found this content useful? Use the button above to save it to your profile.
AIA

Expect VAT 20% from 1 July

by
25th Apr 2010
Save content
Have you found this content useful? Use the button above to save it to your profile.

VAT specialist and former Taxation writer of the year Neil Warren added his voice this week to the chorus of advisers anticipating a VAT rate rise this summer.

"I think it’ll be 20% from 1 July," Warren told AccountingWEB.co.uk. "The European Union average is 19.6%. The change could be significant for businesses considering commercial property purchases," he added. Many firms have to pay VAT on such transactions and a 2.5% rate increase could make a significant difference.

"If you have clients who are planning property purchases, I would advise them to get a move on," Warren said.

According to AccountingWEB.co.uk tax editor Rebecca Benneyworth, the "glaring absence" of a commitment not to raise the standard rate of VAT is a tacit acknowledgment that if re-elected, a Labour government will increase the standard rate, probably to 20%. CIOT tax policy director told BBC's Moneybox radio programme that he also expected the rate to go up. Alun Oliver, writing on the Tax Advice Network website, even refers to "rumours of up to 22.5% being possible future rates", although few commentators are betting on such a huge hike in the standard rate of VAT this summer!

You might remember that the legislation that reduced the standard rate temporarily to 15% in 2008 also gave Parliament the power to alter the standard rate in future simply by statutory instrument, although it seems unlikely that any future government would try to sneak in such a fundamental tax increase without an appropriate Budget announcement and Parliamentary debate.

Benneyworth raised the possibility that the existing lower 5% rate of VAT could be increased, and that some of the zero-rated supply groups could be moved into higher rate categories. Group 2 on the schedule (sewerage and water), group 6 (protected buildings) and group 11 (bank notes) could all find themselves removed from zero-rating. With some variations, Neil Warren agreed with her analysis.

"A lot of the zero and reduced rates won't be touched because they would attract bad publicity," said Warren. "Domestic gas and electricity would be horrendous – the plan to increase it nearly brought down the Major government in 1996."

However, there were odd anomalies that might be targeted, he suggested. Magazines, for example, are zero rated, but their online editions are standard rated. "The heritage industry might object, but raising work on protected buildings to the standard rate could raise extra revenue," Warren added.

So apart from raising the standard rate only minor tinkering with VAT rates is expected this summer. The CIOT reported last week that out on the campaign trail Gordon Brown vowed to freeze income tax rates, and said the VAT zero rate would remain in place for food, children's clothes, books, newspapers and public transport fares.

Meanwhile, the legislative process grinds on. The HMRC website has recently highlighted 'The Finance Act 2008 (Penalties for Errors and Failure to Notify etc) (Consequential Amendments) Order 2010', which came into force on 1 April and brings into force some of the remaining VAT penalty provisions of FA 2007 and FA 2008 on late notification and registration for VAT as well as penalties for issuing an unauthorised VAT invoice, putting a product to a use that attracts a higher rate of excise duty, and handling goods subject to unpaid excise duty. Now might be a good time to make sure you're fully conversant with the new penalty regime, so look back at Rebecca's round-up of our coverage and at HMRC's own guidance.

Tags:

Replies (9)

Please login or register to join the discussion.

Mark Lee headshot 2023
By Mark Lee
26th Apr 2010 12:37

I share the expectation

Back in Feb I explained my thinking on this subject on the TaxBuzz blog in a piece titled: The VAT rate will increase within months. The only question is 'by how much?'

It's all a question of timing and how almost no other tax changes have a fast enough impact on the Exchequer's cashflow.

Mark

 

Thanks (0)
avatar
By User deleted
26th Apr 2010 12:44

Mystic Meg

Are these the same comentators that predicted a huge rise in CGT and withdrawal of entrepreneurs relief? I'm just not sure that this scaremongering helps. If the politicians don't know what they are doing how do the comentators know what the politicians are going to do?

Thanks (0)
avatar
By lawmaniz
26th Apr 2010 12:53

Increase in the rate of VAT.

Those with long memories will remember that one of the first thing the Thatcher government did when it gained power in 1979 was to virtually double the rate of VAT to 15%. That bankrupted many businesses and led to a record increase in the rate of unemployment. The VAT increase also cut the income of those on fixed-incomes such as pensioners, the sick and the unemployed. Is this why the Conservatives are finding it so difficult to win the electoral support that they need and should be getting? Saying that, the election result can be predicted with total accuracity. The winning party, as always, will be the Capitalist Party to which the three main political parties belong albeit as slightly different strands of that Party. One advantage of living in a one-party state like the UK (I would say a one-party democracy but one house of parliament is not elected and neither is the head of state) is that whichever party wins, the financial markets are going to be happy knowing that the UK will follow a decisively right-wing, Capitalist economic policy - and everybody including bean-counters are going to be happy with that - correct?

Thanks (0)
avatar
By w.dodwell
26th Apr 2010 13:36

No chance!

All the major parties have ruled out an immediate increase in VAT, so wouldn't there be a potentially fatal loss of credibility if VAT rose immediately?  Secondly, everyone agrees that taking £12.5 billion out of the economy should nto be done in 2010, due to the weakness of the recovery.  Thirdly, it would be administratibvely impossible to increase benefits/credits sufficiently quickly to make sure that the poorest were protected from a VAT rise. 

Thanks (0)
Rebecca Benneyworth profile image
By Rebecca Benneyworth
26th Apr 2010 16:57

RPI problem

The real problem is RPI. We have the increase on 1 January in the annualised figures at the moment - April's annualised rate is 4.4%, and the price of fuel and the weak £ aren't helping. Also gas went down in early 2009 so this negative effect reduces the RPI artificially as the base figure. I wonder whether a canny chancellor might wait until 1 January 2011?

Thanks (0)
avatar
By User deleted
27th Apr 2010 12:55

VAT increase? Most probable

 The deafening silence on the near £1 Trillion debt, larger than even after WW2!, and an ever increasing amount as nobody in any party is talking cutting the deficit.

la, la land growth from the Treasury and the Chancellor is not going to happen so the deficit will stay near or over £100 Billion p.a. so after 5 years the debt will be £1.5 Trillion!!! Hey I can do arithmetic. I must be an accountant.

The incoming Government, even the idiot Gordon who still talks spend, spend, will have to cut drastically and raise taxes. VAT is an easy target and efficient. Me I like it because other than essentials its me decides whether to spend, not some idiot in Government who thinks he has a God given right to take my money to spend it the way he wants to, mainly on his sycophants.

It will knock the economy but hopefully some sense will prevail and it will be a managed exercise.

 

Thanks (0)
avatar
By User deleted
04th May 2010 16:15

Bankrupt

Is it not time we admitted the UK is a bankrupt third world economy?

How does a country declare itself insolvent ? interesting times ! has Gordons teeming and lading excercise with the tax system begun to unravel ?

Yet we can still afford identity cards, new average speed cameras and other state surveilance, to what end nobody knows yet !

A vat rise should put paid to the survivers! those that remain will be those that fiddled a bit more.

We need lower taxation and more enforcement to collect the £136 billion missing from tax evasion I recon given the tools I could spot at least £10k per hour.

I know who not to vote for ! but is there anyone to vote for ?

 

Thanks (0)
avatar
By mikewhit
04th May 2010 18:02

Save, don't spend

If there was a case for a lower VAT rate on energy use, surely there is an equivalent or better case for the same lower rate on energy-saving measures ... for example, building insulation materials ?

I still find it surprising (in the 21st century !) that politicians harp on about the elderly having fuel poverty, without addressing the underlying cause which is poorly insulated housing, which in many cases could be addressed by re-lining the room(s) with either "Kingspan" or foil/polystyrene overlaid with plasterboard or the equivalent.

No recent properties should exist without this level of insulation.

Thanks (0)
Rebecca Benneyworth profile image
By Rebecca Benneyworth
08th May 2010 09:16

There is, but you have to get a professional to fit it

Mike there is quite a substantial chunk of expenditure which attracts 5% VAT in relation to energy saving technology, right down to thermostatic radiator valves, but it is no god for the DIY'er as it is a reduced rate applying to the supply of installing the technology (by a builder who is VAt registered) who can then supply the related materials at reduced rate too. But always worth prompting your builder if you are having some work done (other than new build which would be zero rated anyway) as he may not be aware of the reduced rate

Thanks (0)