Inheritance tax 'is here to stay'. By Dan Martin

Inheritance tax (IHT) is likely to remain in place despite its unpopularity, a leading expert has claimed.

Alan Auerbach, professor of economics and law at the University of California at Berkeley, said although fewer analysts see a future for capital income taxes ' which includes IHT - it still has a part to play in the tax system.

Delivering the annual lecture for the Institute of Fiscal Studies (IFS), Auerbach said eliminating capital income taxes "is not likely, nor is it particularly desirable".

"Eliminating all taxes on capital income gives up much more revenue than simply eliminat

Continued...

» Register now

The full article is available to registered AccountingWEB members only. To read the rest of this article you’ll need to login or register.

Registration is FREE and allows you to view all content, ask questions, comment and much more.

Comments

Is this gobbledegook?

keanes | | Permalink

Maybe it's me, but I could hardly understand one word of this article! I have never used the term 'capital income taxes' and am unsure what he means. He also seems to be suggesting that we replace these so called capital income taxes with VAT.

The whole article sounds like American academic gobbledegook - can't we find a British expert, who might at least talk a language we understand?

Perhaps "& " is missing

MacSmat | | Permalink

I agree that the article is gobbledegook .. and the way I could make sense of it is when I inadvertently inserted "&" between capital income. I assume that the "learned" professor meant to cover both income taxes as well as capital taxes... but there again perhaps this is where the Chancellor got his ideas for the ultimate "capital income tax" - Pre Owned Asset Taxation !

IHT's future.

Mike Bassy | | Permalink

Like any policy, IHT will be amended as soon as it becomes an electoral liability. Economics or tax policy will have little to do with it.

Don't you just love hearing academics spout theoretical nonsense ? Nice people, but perhaps not in touch with the real world.

Before it was IHT

AnonymousUser | | Permalink

Had he done a little research, or bothered to read the first 3 words of IHTA 1984, s.1, he might have suspected that perhaps we did have a tax regime that "solved the problem" of people giving away their taxed income and gains to relatives and avoiding another layer of tax on it. The tax was re-modelled in its current form (I don't count FA 2004, Sched 15) because it was so "unpopular".