Jones v Garnett: Statement by HM Revenue & Customs. By Nichola Ross Martin

Following the announcement of a hearing date at the House of Lords, HMRC have announced issued a further statement on the Arctic Systems case, and also have provided another link to their guidance on the settlement provisions.

It said: “The Court of Appeal judgment represents the law as it now stands.

Continued...

» Register now

The full article is available to registered AccountingWEB members only. To read the rest of this article you’ll need to login or register.

Registration is FREE and allows you to view all content, ask questions, comment and much more.

Comments

Revenue are at it again

dgwsoft | | Permalink

As I have posted here before, my 2001 tax return has been challenged under S660A, and is destined for the commissioners, pending the result of Jones v Garnett.

The trusts office have now written to me saying they are opening an investigation into my 2003 tax return. I understand this is to protect their position. But surely any *new* investigation must be conducted on the basis of the "law as it now stands", i.e. the court of appeal judgement? Any thoughts on this?

B M

AnonymousUser | | Permalink

this is just what the Government vision is. No small business. Pressure all ways until we disappear.
I suppose they take a look at Tesco, Sainsburys etc. and think "well if it works for them why not for us".