Save content
Have you found this content useful? Use the button above to save it to your profile.
AIA

Labour pledges no increase in income tax rates

by
13th Apr 2005
Save content
Have you found this content useful? Use the button above to save it to your profile.

The Labour Party has launched its general election manifesto and pledged not to increase the basic or top rate of income tax.

The party has promised to continue to make "targeted tax cuts for families" but there is no mention of national insurance contributions in the 112-page manifesto.

The manifesto said at page 16: "Labour believes tax policy should continue to be governed by the health of the public finances, the requirement for public investment and the needs of families, business and the environment.

"We will not raise the basic or top rates of income tax in the next Parliament. We renew our pledge not to extend VAT to food, children's clothes, books, newspapers and public transport fares.

"We will continue to make targeted tax cuts for families and to support work. As a result of personal tax and benefit measures introduced since 1997, by October 2005 families with children will be on average £1,400 a year better off in real terms. Living standards in Britain have been rising, on average, by 2.5 per cent per year since 1997 ' a total increase of nearly 20 per cent.

"We want a tax regime that supports British business. That is why we have cut corporation tax to its lowest ever level, introduced the best regime of capital gains tax in any industrialised country, and introduced a new Research and Development tax credit."

'Hidden price tag'
Reports said shadow chancellor Oliver Letwin warned that Labour's spending plans had a "hidden price tag". The Conservatives have insisted that taxes will rise if Labour wins the election.

Letwin challenged Labour over what he described as an £11bn "black hole" in its spending plans. "The question is very simple. How are they going to pay for it?" he asked.

"They are planning to spend more and borrow more than we are and they will have to tax more as well."

But Mr Letwin refused to give a commitment that a Conservative government would not raise taxes, according to the BBC News website. "This is a question not of promises but of trust," he said.

"The issue here is whether you trust Mr Blair, who said before the last election he would not raise taxes and then raised them 66 times by stealth, or whether you trust us."

Tory Treasury spokesman George Osborne claimed that if NICs are increased to cover Labour's "black hole", a couple on average earnings will be £1,000 a year worse off.

The Liberal Democrats will launch their manifesto on 14 April.

Andrew Goodall
Editor, TaxZone

Tags:

Replies (7)

Please login or register to join the discussion.

avatar
By NeilW
13th Apr 2005 13:15

Blair 'crys wolf' again.
This time lets hope his sheep get eaten.

NeilW

Thanks (0)
avatar
By Rachel Battersby
13th Apr 2005 12:24

Not the whole truth?
Any comments yet about the intentions for National Insurance?

Thanks (0)
avatar
By listerramjet
13th Apr 2005 12:30

yeah right
is this being economical with the truth, or is it just a plain lie?

Thanks (0)
avatar
By JSJ54
13th Apr 2005 14:15

All pigs fed & watered & ready to fly
yet again.

Thanks (0)
avatar
By AnonymousUser
13th Apr 2005 17:22

why should they?
Its madness for politicians to feel compelled to say they will "never" do certain things with taxes and NIC. The phrase "Events dear boy" made by the late Harold Macmillan comes to mind.

So by not categorically ruling out changes to NIC, the inference seems to become that rises are on the way?? This is the infantile level of "analysis" that we are now faced with it would seem.

Without wanting to make a political point it should be remembered that ALL parties in government seek to use whatever methods they can to raise revenue whilst at the same time causing "minimum" noticable pain to their supporters. The overall tax burden doesnt tend to alter much as reduced income tax rates tend to be counterbalaced by other measures such as increased VAT. We just have a self regarding media these days that thinks "stealth taxes" is a clever journalistic phrase.

Thanks (0)
avatar
By User deleted
18th Apr 2005 10:00

Little Britain Or A United Kingdom?
Well as I see it its a straight choice between the closet Tory in the red corner, (Blair), and the plausable but fake Tory in the Zionist one, (Howard). Some choice! However Blair gets my vote no matter what as he's stepping down soon anyway.. and I'm impressed with GB's handling of the UK economy. Economic stability and social harmony are good things. We must not return to the days of a dis-United Kingdom as instigated by Thatcher. For me, Labour are now the natural party of government. Most Tories would be more honest if they just joined the BNP.

Thanks (0)
avatar
By User deleted
19th Apr 2005 11:19

Black Cab Man
Sorry "most Tories" are not racists, I don't see why you are still blaming Margaret Thatcher for so many of the problems of this country when to my recollection she hasn't been in power for a while - future governments can reverse things you know but it's easier just to blame everyone else isn't it. What about all the strikes at the end of the Callaghan years and the problems they caused? Unlike you I don't think I'll be blaming current members of the Labour Party for what happened long ago - 77/78 wasn't it?

I think the majority of people in this country wish they didn't have to vote for any of these parties. However tax and economic issues are what most of the accountingweb members rather than outright political issues are interested in aren't they?

Thanks (0)